On Dec 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all thank you for help on the kernel configuration (I went to the
> newest version). I now have two questions if you update gcc, glibc, or
> binutils: Do you have to start back with 5.1 or can you build these with
> older v
First of all thank you for help on the kernel configuration (I went to the
newest version). I now have two questions if you update gcc, glibc, or
binutils: Do you have to start back with 5.1 or can you build these with
older versions that were in tools if it was preserved? My second question
is w
Ken Moffat wrote:
For glibc, the _safe_ advice is always to rebuild the whole system :)
I can personally attest to that, having made the fatal error of doing a
'make install' from the wrong xterm and overwriting the host's libc.
Not even 'ls' coped with that tiny mistake!
Binutils and gc
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Laurens Blankers wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a LFS 6.0 system and I was wondering if it is save to upgrade gcc,
> glibc and binutils to the new versions in 6.1. Will such an upgrade break
> anything? Make the system unusable? Or should it be safe? In case of a glibc
> upgra
Hello all,
I have a LFS 6.0 system and I was wondering if it is save to upgrade
gcc, glibc and binutils to the new versions in 6.1. Will such an
upgrade break anything? Make the system unusable? Or should it be safe?
In case of a glibc upgrade I guess I should also upgrade the kernel
headers.
Lau
