Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2013-07-25 Thread Unix User
17:44 Donnerstag, 25.Juli 2013 Betreff: Re: [lfs-support] (no subject) On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:47:56PM +0100, Unix User wrote: > Dear list, > > after encountering a problem and searching the internet I decided to start a > fresh 7.3 install - which was also suggested to someone

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2013-07-25 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:47:56PM +0100, Unix User wrote: > Dear list, > > after encountering a problem and searching the internet I decided to start a > fresh 7.3 install - which was also suggested to someone encountering the same > error but on different LFS version. However, at section 5.8.1

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2013-07-25 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
> De: Unix User mailinglistaccount_at_yahoo.com >Para: lfs-support >Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 25 de Julho de 2013 8:47 >Assunto: [lfs-support] (no subject) ... >Host is Lubuntu 13.04, the output of version-check is attached to this >email (although /bin/sh is a link to dash, echo $SHELL output is

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2013-01-06 Thread matthew gruda
im fairly sure i did that. also i noticed that ommiting "-Wl," will succesfully compile, with readelf on a.out giving me [Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Roy Birk wrote: > Did you do this part in 5.8, > > make -C ld clean > make

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2013-01-06 Thread Roy Birk
Did you do this part in 5.8, make -C ld clean make -C ld LIB_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib cp -v ld/ld-new /tools/bin On Jan 6, 2013, at 11:48 AM, matthew gruda wrote: > im fairly sure i did everything for 64 bit though... > > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Roy Birk wrote: > It seems like there's mo

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2013-01-06 Thread matthew gruda
im fairly sure i did everything for 64 bit though... On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Roy Birk wrote: > It seems like there's more to it than just the architecture, but you > should probably re-read the intro portion on "LFS Target Architectures". I > think you might need to start over and be su

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2013-01-06 Thread Roy Birk
It seems like there's more to it than just the architecture, but you should probably re-read the intro portion on "LFS Target Architectures". I think you might need to start over and be sure to follow the parts of the book for 64-bit systems, but hopefully one of the gurus will respond if I've s

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2013-01-06 Thread matthew gruda
so how do i fix this? On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Roy Birk wrote: > I think it's because you're on a 64-bit system. > > > > On Jan 6, 2013, at 8:51 AM, matthew gruda wrote: > > > now i got up to 6.10 and i tried: > > echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c > > cc dummy.c -v -Wl, --verbose > > > > and go

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2013-01-06 Thread Roy Birk
I think it's because you're on a 64-bit system. On Jan 6, 2013, at 8:51 AM, matthew gruda wrote: > now i got up to 6.10 and i tried: > echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c > cc dummy.c -v -Wl, --verbose > > and got: > GNU assembler version 2.22 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) using BFD version (GNU > Binut

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2012-12-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:53:53PM -0800, JIA Pei wrote: > > So, which *pwd* should I run make *mrproper* ? > The directory created when you untarred the package. Not sure of the package version you are using, but linux-3.* should match. Same as in chapter 5 : untar the package, cd into the d

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2012-11-28 Thread Tobias Linus Seidler
thanks for answering. > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:46:35 + > From: zarniwh...@ntlworld.com > To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] (no subject) > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 07:55:17PM +, Tobias Linus Seidler wrote: > > > > &g

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2012-11-24 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 07:55:17PM +, Tobias Linus Seidler wrote: > > > Hello. > > I downloaded and decompressed the packages with wget as instructed in the lfs > book. Within the host-system and as lfs-user I created and cd-ed into the > binutils-build folder and executed the ../binutils-

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2012-09-22 Thread Israel Silberg
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Mikie wrote: > >Did you remove backslashes at the end of lines? > > >It should look like below: > > >./configure --prefix=/usr \ > --libexecdir=/usr/lib \ > >... > > >Try just copy&paste from the book. > > -- > Pozdrawiam, > Tomasz Sekściński > > Israe

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2012-09-20 Thread Mikie
>Did you remove backslashes at the end of lines? >It should look like below: >./configure --prefix=/usr \ --libexecdir=/usr/lib \ >... >Try just copy&paste from the book. -- Pozdrawiam, Tomasz Sekściński Israel, Those back-slashes mean "continue on the next line" ... so that you

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2012-09-20 Thread Tomasz Sekściński
Dnia 2012-09-20, o godz. 16:03:03 Israel Silberg napisał(a): > Hi All, > I'm about to loose any hope of finishing this LFS build. > During the MAN-DB compilation in section 6.55 > in the section: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > --libexecdir=/usr/lib > --docdir=/usr/share/doc/man-db-2.6.2 > --sys

Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2011-11-24 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 11/24/2011 10:41 AM, Aaron Hill wrote: I am using Version 7.0 of the LFS book. When I try to compile GCC with the make command as root, I receive the following error: cc1-checksum.o main.o tree-browser.o libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a ..