Angel Tsankov wrote:
As what user should I re-adjust the toolchain in Ch. 6 of LFS 6.1.1?
Hi
I think I'll try the user based packager very soon and your shell script
sounds interesting, is it possible to see it ?
Thanks heaps
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ
Chris Staub wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
You're not *supposed* to be using package users in chapter 5. It's only in
chapter 6. The only package installed using package users so far should be
glibc.
From the hint:
Build Chapter 5 exactly as explained by the LFS book. There is only one
little c
Angel Tsankov wrote:
You're not *supposed* to be using package users in chapter 5. It's
only in chapter 6. The only package installed using package users so
far should be glibc.
Why glibc only?! What about Linux Libc headers and Man pages - the hint
recommends to install them using PU?
Well
You're not *supposed* to be using package users in chapter 5. It's only
in chapter 6. The only package installed using package users so far
should be glibc.
Why glibc only?! What about Linux Libc headers and Man pages - the hint
recommends to install them using PU?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.o
Chris Staub wrote:
You're not *supposed* to be using package users in chapter 5. It's only
in chapter 6. The only package installed using package users so far
should be glibc.
From the hint:
Build Chapter 5 exactly as explained by the LFS book. There is only one
little change you have to ma
Brandon Peirce wrote:
Why root?
Of course you can always achieve this with root, but that's kind of
missing the point of package users technique, (and also violating
principle of least privelege).
I concede that the motivation for why you would use the package users
technique in the first pla
Chris Staub wrote:
The adjusted linker is installed into /tools, so you need to use root.
Why root?
Of course you can always achieve this with root, but that's kind of missing
the point of package users technique, (and also violating principle of least
privelege).
I concede that the motivat
Brandon Peirce wrote:
Angel Tsankov wrote:
For LFS 6.1.1 the instructions says "Install the adjusted linker by
running the following command from within the binutils-build directory:"
The "make -C ld ... install" command is different to the LFS 6.2
commands but is still manipulating (in 6.1.1
Angel Tsankov wrote:
As what user should I re-adjust the toolchain in Ch. 6 of LFS 6.1.1?
If you need to ask this, you shouldn't be using package users. Besides,
the whole toolchain readjustment only affects stuff in /tools, so it
doesn't make any difference what user you use.
--
http://linu
As what user should I re-adjust the toolchain in Ch. 6 of LFS 6.1.1?
"First, backup the /tools linker, and replace it with..."
The linker (ld) is part of the binutils package, so the first block of
commands (3 mv and 1 ln) should be done as your binutils
package user.
For LFS 6.1.1 the instruc
Angel Tsankov wrote:
As what user should I re-adjust the toolchain in Ch. 6 of LFS 6.1.1?
"First, backup the /tools linker, and replace it with..."
The linker (ld) is part of the binutils package, so the first block of
commands (3 mv and 1 ln) should be done as your binutils
package user.
F
As what user should I re-adjust the toolchain in Ch. 6 of LFS 6.1.1?
"First, backup the /tools linker, and replace it with..."
The linker (ld) is part of the binutils package, so the first block of
commands (3 mv and 1 ln) should be done as your binutils
package user.
"Next, amend the GCC specs
Angel Tsankov wrote:
As what user should I re-adjust the toolchain in Ch. 6 of LFS 6.1.1?
"First, backup the /tools linker, and replace it with..."
The linker (ld) is part of the binutils package, so the first block of
commands (3 mv and 1 ln) should be done as your binutils
package user.
"Nex
13 matches
Mail list logo
