Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:02:58 -0400
>> "Bill Cunningham" wrote:
>>
>> Now it's not glibc I am concerned about my new builds of c++ and
>> gfortran compilers are failing. C is the only thing that works. and
>> the g++-3.2.2 that came with RH9. I'm using it to compile
>On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:02:58 -0400
>"Bill Cunningham" wrote:
>
> Now it's not glibc I am concerned about my new builds of c++ and
> gfortran compilers are failing. C is the only thing that works. and
> the g++-3.2.2 that came with RH9. I'm using it to compile gcc-4.5.3
> and 4.6.1 and runnin
William Immendorf wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Bill Cunningham
> wrote:
>> I have a livecd of lfs. I think that will do. now if I could just
>> figure out how to get the system running with it. I will look
>> closely at the docs.
> As long as that LiveCD is of LFS 6.3, you are fine.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Bill Cunningham
wrote:
> I have a livecd of lfs. I think that will do. now if I could just figure
> out how to get the system running with it. I will look closely at the docs.
As long as that LiveCD is of LFS 6.3, you are fine.
--
William Immendorf
The ultima
William Immendorf wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Simon Geard
> wrote:
>> Just find a live disk of some recent distro, and use that as a host -
>> Ubuntu is good, someone else suggested Gentoo. You don't actually
>> need to install it - just boot off a CD or USB stick, and build the
>> p
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> Just find a live disk of some recent distro, and use that as a host -
> Ubuntu is good, someone else suggested Gentoo. You don't actually need
> to install it - just boot off a CD or USB stick, and build the packages
> from there. Forget about
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 22:57 -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Ok thanks all. I see. I will check it out. Once I build this 5.1 would I
> be able to go to 6.8 immediately?
No, don't do that - LFS 5.1 is itself an ancient version, from 2005 or
so. Bruce probably only mentioned it because it was t
<<<
On my host system? Oh no. The kernel that comes with RH9. 2.4.20-6. A
redhat version of a 2.4 kernel. I would just install the latest gentoo but
it's about as difficult if not more so than lfs. I have the minimal ISO and
have to go online and download a couple of files and use nano.
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
>>> One thing that you haven't yet stated explicitly: are you using a
>>> recent 2.6 kernel ?
>>
>> On my host system? Oh no. The kernel that comes with RH9. 2.4.20-6.
>
> Host System Requirements:
>
> Linux Kernel-2.6.22.5 (having been compiled with
Bill Cunningham wrote:
>> One thing that you haven't yet stated explicitly: are you using a
>> recent 2.6 kernel ?
>
> On my host system? Oh no. The kernel that comes with RH9. 2.4.20-6.
Host System Requirements:
Linux Kernel-2.6.22.5 (having been compiled with GCC-4.1.2 or greater)
It's
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:05:35PM -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>>
>> Well I built gcc-4.5.2 with a gcc-3.4.6 compiler. I can rebuild
>> it with a gcc-4.6.1 compiler I have tucked away. My linux system is
>> old I know but I use some pretty up to date development tools
>> i
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:05:35PM -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>>
>> Well I built gcc-4.5.2 with a gcc-3.4.6 compiler. I can rebuild
>> it with a gcc-4.6.1 compiler I have tucked away. My linux system is
>> old I know but I use some pretty up to date development tools
>> i
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 09:05:35PM -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
> Well I built gcc-4.5.2 with a gcc-3.4.6 compiler. I can rebuild it with
> a gcc-4.6.1 compiler I have tucked away. My linux system is old I know but I
> use some pretty up to date development tools including binutils-2.21.1
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:55:29PM -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>> Well yet again I'm having problems with glibc-2.13. Now it is
>> saying that gcc has not supplied a header called cpuid.h. glibc gets
>> a little tiring I guess the stable version has some bugs like the
>> e
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:55:29PM -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Well yet again I'm having problems with glibc-2.13. Now it is saying
> that gcc has not supplied a header called cpuid.h. glibc gets a little
> tiring I guess the stable version has some bugs like the earlier stack
> problem.
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 14:34 -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> /lfs/g or g is a separate build directory. I think this has something to
> do with the kernel headers. limits.h isn't being found. I copied and pasted
> things and I guess I should follow the book more closely.
If you're looking for
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:29:59 -0400
> "Bill Cunningham" wrote:
>
>> I am using the stable 6.8 versions now and I keep getting this
>> error when trying to compile glibc.
>>
>>
>> printf_fp.c: In function '___printf_fp':
>> printf_fp.c:643:17: warning: variable 'used_limbs
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:29:59 -0400
"Bill Cunningham" wrote:
> I am using the stable 6.8 versions now and I keep getting this error
> when trying to compile glibc.
>
>
> printf_fp.c: In function '___printf_fp':
> printf_fp.c:643:17: warning: variable 'used_limbs' set but not used
> [-Wunus
Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Sounds like a plan. The thing is there is no wget list for the crueent
> release 6.8 that I can see. I might have to download the required packages
> one by one.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.8/wget-list
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/packages.htm
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 06:03:19AM -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>> MBW wrote:
>>>
>>> 1) What version of LFS are you building?
>>> 2) Have you deviated from the book (even in the slightest bit)?
>>
>> No I did not. That is why I am so suprised in getting this
>> error. I am
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 06:03:19AM -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> MBW wrote:
> >
> > 1) What version of LFS are you building?
> > 2) Have you deviated from the book (even in the slightest bit)?
>
> No I did not. That is why I am so suprised in getting this error. I am
> not going by 6.8 but
MBW wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Bill Cunningham
> wrote:
>> I got this error in my log after compiling glibc fine. And then
>> trying to install it. What did I do or not do now?
>>
>>
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> make[2]: *** [/mnt/lfs/g/nscd/nscd] Error 1
>> make[1]: *
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Bill Cunningham
wrote:
> I got this error in my log after compiling glibc fine. And then trying
> to install it. What did I do or not do now?
>
>
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: *** [/mnt/lfs/g/nscd/nscd] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [nscd/others] Er
Doug Downham wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
>> Doug Downham wrote:
>>> In section 6.10, using version 6.5 of the LFS book, I've encountered a
>>> strange error.
>>>
>>> When I create dummy.c and run 'cc dummy.c -v -Wl, --verbose &>
>>> dummy.log', a.out is not produced. dummy.log says
>> If this is
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Doug Downham wrote:
>> In section 6.10, using version 6.5 of the LFS book, I've encountered a
>> strange error.
>>
>> When I create dummy.c and run 'cc dummy.c -v -Wl, --verbose &>
>> dummy.log', a.out is not produced. dummy.log says
>
> If this is exactly the command, then
Hmm... That's odd, the comma is in the book. However, removing the
space as Philippe pointed out made a difference. However, it's just a
different error.
I seem to be missing libgcc.so, libgcc_s.so, and libgcc_s.a.
libgcc.a is there.
New dummy.log attached, but at this point, I suspect I ma
Doug Downham wrote:
> In section 6.10, using version 6.5 of the LFS book, I've encountered a
> strange error.
>
> When I create dummy.c and run 'cc dummy.c -v -Wl, --verbose &>
> dummy.log', a.out is not produced. dummy.log says
If this is exactly the command, then you need to get the comma out.
Le mercredi 02 décembre à 14:56, Doug Downham a écrit :
> When I create dummy.c and run 'cc dummy.c -v -Wl, --verbose &>
> dummy.log', a.out is not produced.
I don't if it's of any impotance but in the book there's no space between
-Wl, and --verbose.
--
--
Ph. Delavalade
--
http:/
A google search for "error:asm-generic/errno.h: No such file or
directory", leads to this thread
"http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=518746";
which ends with the user building glibc in
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-x.x.x/glibc-build
rather than building from
/mnt/lfs/sources/glib
> Hmmm, a dual processor 400MHz... Compaq AP400 professional worstation
maybe? I worked a lot with those in my former company :)
one thing. these are ma first steps with with compilation lfs and smp.
Can you tell me what is worth look at configuration opions in kernel 2.6
to run it withou
> Hmmm, a dual processor 400MHz... Compaq AP400 professional worstation
> maybe? I worked a lot with those in my former company :)
I have Dell precision workstation 410 with 2 x PII 400 Mhz. mainly to
experiment with smp and lfs.
> However, I think your previous (lucky?) result with MAKEOPTS
Wojciech Giel wrote:
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of lfs-support digest..."
Please follow that advice. It makes life easier for people to see what
the mail is about before they open it :-)
>
>From: "Brandon Peirce"
>
>Wojciech Giel
Wojciech Giel wrote:
Hi
I'm compiling LFS 6.2.
I get this result of check test of glibc in 6.9 chapter
root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
That one, as you can see, is safe to ignore
make[2]: *** [/source
On 10/19/05, randhir phagura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems it cannot locate '/tools/bin/gcc', which is very much there.
It seems to me that the configure script finds /tools/bin/gcc.
But then, when it tries to run it, there is some required library
not found.
I really don't know what could be
34 matches
Mail list logo
