Re: Question on the ways adjusting specs file

2008-02-29 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The command covers all the arches we currently support: x86 and x86_64 > > for Linux. We really don't need to be adjusting the default specs for > > GNU ma

Re: Question on the ways adjusting specs file

2008-02-28 Thread Charles
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The command covers all the arches we currently support: x86 and x86_64 > for Linux. We really don't need to be adjusting the default specs for > GNU mach. It definitely works, but you can fool around with it > yourself if you'd like

Re: Question on the ways adjusting specs file

2008-02-28 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm wondering how good is the job done by the specs commands in the > book. At first I compared the commands to the former specs patch. I > found that it did less than the patch. The commands didn't check for > fi

Question on the ways adjusting specs file

2008-02-28 Thread Charles
Hi all, I'm wondering how good is the job done by the specs commands in the book. At first I compared the commands to the former specs patch. I found that it did less than the patch. The commands didn't check for files with the name 'gnu.h' and some header files in other architectures like 'sysv4.