On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 04:06:00PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> Well..you'll probably be treading water for a bit. BLFS is nowhere near
> ready for LFS-6.4, though we are getting there.
Bummer. I guess I mis-read a post which led me to believe that BLFS
had advanced to the point of not being ba
Scott wrote:
> Wow, I can't believe I've made it this far without disaster!
>
> Just a question here: The book (6.4-rc1) warns to ensure that none of
> the programs to be stripped are running, and suggests re-chrooting "if
> unsure whether chroot was properly entered". However, I recall that in
>
For what its worth, this newbie did LFS at least four times before I
got it right.
On Nov 30, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Scott wrote:
> Wow, I can't believe I've made it this far without disaster!
>
> Just a question here: The book (6.4-rc1) warns to ensure that none of
> the programs to be stripped a
Wow, I can't believe I've made it this far without disaster!
Just a question here: The book (6.4-rc1) warns to ensure that none of
the programs to be stripped are running, and suggests re-chrooting "if
unsure whether chroot was properly entered". However, I recall that in
the bash chapter we were
