On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Drew Ames wrote:
>
> Congrats on making it through chapter 6!
Thanks.
> The permissions you have are the same as what I have except for
> /bin/passwd.
> I've got -rwsr-xr-x for passwd.
>
> I'm not sure that these commands need to be group writable -- although
> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/19/2011 02:11 PM, bsquared wrote:
> Drew,
> I had another question about the tips you had posted for shadow. I
> wonder if you could verify the permissions, it seems to me that they
> should be group writable as well.
>
> -rwsr-xr-x "/bin/su"
Drew,
I had another question about the tips you had posted for shadow. I
wonder if you could verify the permissions, it seems to me that they
should be group writable as well.
-rwsr-xr-x "/bin/su" root:shadow
-rwsr-xr-x "/usr/bin/chage" root:shadow
-rwsr-xr-x "/usr/bin/chfn" root:shadow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2011 11:14 AM, Brian Winfrey wrote:
>>
> coreutils:
> The section that has the list of files to move caused problems due to
> bash's path caching. Either turn it off in pkg users bash profile or
> do not move the 'mv' program until the last
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Drew Ames wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/23/2011 08:50 PM, Brian Winfrey wrote:
>> Sorry, that sounded unappreciative in retrospect, and that is not the
>> case. Thanks for posting you notes.
> No problem! I didn't take it as an
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Brian Winfrey wrote:
>
>> update:
>> util_linux-ng need to change permissions on /usr/lib/pkgconfig/
>
> Why? They look OK to me.
>
> -- Bruce
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.
Brian Winfrey wrote:
> update:
> util_linux-ng need to change permissions on /usr/lib/pkgconfig/
Why? They look OK to me.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Drew Ames wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/23/2011 08:50 PM, Brian Winfrey wrote:
>> Sorry, that sounded unappreciative in retrospect, and that is not the
>> case. Thanks for posting you notes.
> No problem! I didn't take it as an
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Drew Ames wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/23/2011 08:50 PM, Brian Winfrey wrote:
>> Sorry, that sounded unappreciative in retrospect, and that is not the
>> case. Thanks for posting you notes.
> No problem! I didn't take it as an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2011 08:50 PM, Brian Winfrey wrote:
> Sorry, that sounded unappreciative in retrospect, and that is not the
> case. Thanks for posting you notes.
No problem! I didn't take it as anything but a simple thank you.
For that matter, please let me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2011 08:49 PM, Brian Winfrey wrote:
>> point of building Shadow yet. But check out my build notes for LFS 6.6
>> here:
>>
>>
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/blog/lufbery-287892/build-notes-for-lfs-6-6-with-package-users-part-3-3258/
>>
Sorry, that sounded unappreciative in retrospect, and that is not the
case. Thanks for posting you notes.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> point of building Shadow yet. But check out my build notes for LFS 6.6
> here:
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/blog/lufbery-287892/build-notes-for-lfs-6-6-with-package-users-part-3-3258/
>
> Please let me know what you think about the build notes and what you
> find out about the shad
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Brian Winfrey wrote:
>
> Currently, I have an altogether different problem. Shadow is not
> installing all files, and I may have screwed things up. Even though
> install indicated success and the logs looked good, some files did not
> install. Now I have to try
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Drew Ames wrote:
> I'm currently building LFS 6.7 with package users, and I'm not at the
> point of building Shadow yet. But check out my build notes for LFS 6.6
> here:
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/blog/lufbery-287892/build-notes-for-lfs-6-6-with-pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/2011 01:50 PM, Brian Winfrey wrote:
> It looks like these "bugs" noted in the Package Users hint for shadow
> have been handled in LFS Stable.
>
> 1) coreutils' groups is installed in /usr/bin and shadow's
> groups is installed
> I don't use package-users, so know nothing about the su.1 page, but
> why would you expect to NOT install manpages provided by a package ?
>
The su.1 problem was one of permissions. While LFS did not install su,
it did install the man page. It apparently has been fixed in stable.
I don't have
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:50:53AM -0800, Brian Winfrey wrote:
>
> However, I was unable to find a references to the foreign language and
> su man pages in the make file.
> By default shadow wants to install non-English manpages.
> you will have to remove the su.1 manpage manually as r
It looks like these "bugs" noted in the Package Users hint for shadow
have been handled in LFS Stable.
1) coreutils' groups is installed in /usr/bin and shadow's
groups is installed in /bin, so it's enough to delete shadow's groups
after installation.
2) The manpage i
19 matches
Mail list logo
