Am Montag, 7. August 2006 01:32 schrieb Brandon Peirce:
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> >Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 16:52 schrieb Mag. Leonhard Landrock:
> > > I did some simple investigation based on what Dan Nicholson told in his
> > > e-mail. It definitely looks as if the b
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 16:52 schrieb Mag. Leonhard Landrock:
> I did some simple investigation based on what Dan Nicholson told in his
> e-mail. It definitely looks as if the binutils package tries to use the
gcc
> compiler of "GCC-4.0.3 - P
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 16:52 schrieb Mag. Leonhard Landrock:
> I did some simple investigation based on what Dan Nicholson told in his
> e-mail. It definitely looks as if the binutils package tries to use the gcc
> compiler of "GCC-4.0.3 - Pass 1".
>
> -> I'll take a try to clean up the "tools"
Hi Dan!
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 16:24 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> Why don't you try the above again with:
>
> $ gcc -v -Wl,--verbose SOMEFILE.c
>
> That should tell you a lot more information about what gcc and
> binutils are doing.
Thanks for your answer. I did "gcc -v -Wl,--verbose SOMEFILE.c"
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 13:48 schrieb Chris Staub:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > The first try (with LFS Version 6.2) went one step further. -> GCC-4.0.3
> > - Pass 1
> >
> > There (GCC-4.0.3 - Pass 1) an error ocoured and I started the build
> > process again with Binutils. Now they faile
On 8/6/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/media/sdb3/sources$ cat > SOMEFILE.c << "EOF"
int main () {}
EOF
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/media/sdb3/sources$ gcc SOMEFILE.c
/tools/bin/ld: warning: ld-linux.so.2, needed by /lib/libc.so.6, not found
(try using -rpath or
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 13:11 schrieb Chris Staub:
Then, as I said before - what "failed GCC build" are you talking about?
Binutils is the first package installed, so you shouldn't have built GCC
yet. What exactly are you referring to?
The first try (with LFS V
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 13:11 schrieb Chris Staub:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:09 schrieb Chris Staub:
> >> More information is needed. What do you mean "failed GCC build"? Is this
> >> binutils pass 1 or pass 2?
> >
> > Well, as in the reference said: first
First of all thanks for the helpful answer!
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 18:50 schrieb Vladimir A. Pavlov:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:03, Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
> > configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 12:16:16PM +0200, Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot
> create executables.
>
In this situation, important information is almost always in the
conf
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:09 schrieb Chris Staub:
More information is needed. What do you mean "failed GCC build"? Is this
binutils pass 1 or pass 2?
Well, as in the reference said: first pass
Then, as I said before - what "failed GCC build" are you talking
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:18 schrieb Randy McMurchy:
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote these words on 08/05/06 09:03 CST:
I am writing some scripts for my LFS build.
I would abandon that effort until you know it works by simply
following the book. People asking for
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:18 schrieb Randy McMurchy:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote these words on 08/05/06 09:03 CST:
> > I am writing some scripts for my LFS build.
>
> I would abandon that effort until you know it works by simply
> following the book. People asking for support on this list a
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:09 schrieb Chris Staub:
> Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > Note, that I just realized that error after I tried to build gcc.
> > Probably the (failed) gcc build broke something.
> >
> > BTW: My binutils script looks like this:
> >
> >
> > Can anyo
On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:03, Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot
> create executables.
> make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
> make: *** No rule
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote these words on 08/05/06 09:03 CST:
> I am writing some scripts for my LFS build.
I would abandon that effort until you know it works by simply
following the book. People asking for support on this list are
expected to be using the book, whether cut-and-paste or typing
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Hi everyone!
Now, that LFS-BOOK 6.2 is out I did a new try on LFS.
I am using Debian testing (etch) and here the problem starts. The system has
some tools in an version to new for the book.
I am writing some scripts for my LFS build. Here is the output of my fir
Hi everyone!
Now, that LFS-BOOK 6.2 is out I did a new try on LFS.
I am using Debian testing (etch) and here the problem starts. The system has
some tools in an version to new for the book.
I am writing some scripts for my LFS build. Here is the output of my first
script (NOTE: It tells for ea
18 matches
Mail list logo
