Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-23 Thread Scott Castaline
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 20:19 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/22/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Now the only > > problem that I'm aware of is my delete key doesn't work, although I > > think I may have fixed it just haven't had time to boot lfs to check it. > > One very ea

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-22 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/22/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Finally got lfs-6.2 running on my box. Great. Have fun. Now the only problem that I'm aware of is my delete key doesn't work, although I think I may have fixed it just haven't had time to boot lfs to check it. One very easy thing to ch

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-22 Thread Scott Castaline
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 19:53 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > all packages built and installed between 1st adjust and gcc 2nd pass are > > ok they reflect the correct /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2, only gcc is wrong. > > By removing the source

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: all packages built and installed between 1st adjust and gcc 2nd pass are ok they reflect the correct /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2, only gcc is wrong. By removing the source files for gcc did I remove something needed in the 2nd pass of the gcc b

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Scott Castaline
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 18:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It seems that gcc is the only one pointing to lib instead of tools/lib > > all the others point to tools/lib on the readelf -l command and it looks > > like the spec file is set

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It seems that gcc is the only one pointing to lib instead of tools/lib all the others point to tools/lib on the readelf -l command and it looks like the spec file is set to tools/lib and not lib. Before doing pass 2 of gcc and binutils, I bl

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Scott Castaline
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:54 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm not sure but I think I found it in > > $LFS/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3 > > > > On viewing it I found this: > > > > *dynamic_linker: > > /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 >

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/18/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure but I think I found it in > $LFS/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3 > > On viewing it I found this: > > *dynamic_linker: > /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 This is correct. Do

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not sure but I think I found it in $LFS/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3 On viewing it I found this: *dynamic_linker: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 This is just before a section called *Link_command: towards the end. As I'm using the

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Scott Castaline
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:24 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > > > > $ readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter > > > > > > If the output says /lib/ld-linux.so.2, then you're in t

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Scott Castaline
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:24 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > > > > $ readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter > > > > > > If the output says /lib/ld-linux.so.2, then you're in t

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > $ readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter > > If the output says /lib/ld-linux.so.2, then you're in trouble because > that dynamic linker doesn't exist yet inside the chroot. It

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Scott Castaline
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > configure:2634: gcc --version &5 > > ../glibc-2.3.6/configure: line 2635: /tools/bin/gcc: No such file or > > directory > > configure:2637: $? = 127 > > So, does /tools/bin/gcc

Re: LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: configure:2634: gcc --version &5 ../glibc-2.3.6/configure: line 2635: /tools/bin/gcc: No such file or directory configure:2637: $? = 127 So, does /tools/bin/gcc exist? If so, what happens when you run `/tools/bin/gcc --version'? I suspect

LFS 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6

2006-08-18 Thread Scott Castaline
When I had originally started I was actually having trouble at 6.12.GCC-4.0.3. After spending a day trying to figure out what went wrong I decided to start over again. So I blew off everything that I had built so far including the partitions on my HDD. I have 3 HDDs in my system. HDD1 = IDE PATA 1