On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:54:06PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:44:31PM -0500, Mike Hollis wrote:
> > The LatArCyrHeb-16 has less missing glyphs than the default and I like
> > it better than some others I tried. The arrow glyphs at the top of the
> > lynx browser are mis
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:44:31PM -0500, Mike Hollis wrote:
> The LatArCyrHeb-16 has less missing glyphs than the default and I like
> it better than some others I tried. The arrow glyphs at the top of the
> lynx browser are missing,however.
that's the one with the "soviet-style" cyrillic glyp
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:10:46PM +, David Shaw wrote:
> Stupid question time.
>
> What font would be appropriate for a British set up? I cannot make head
> nor tail of the options available.
>
> At least the keymap is nice and easy to work out :-)
>
> Many thanks,
>
> David Shaw
> --
Ken,
Many thanks for your very prompt and informative reply.
On 15/11/10 17:49, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Try them. I've no idea how your screen is set up, but *for just
> english* lat1-16.psfu.gz (so "lat1-16") is probably an adequate
> place to begin.
As this is my first serious attempt at an LFS b
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:10:46PM +, David Shaw wrote:
> Stupid question time.
>
> What font would be appropriate for a British set up? I cannot make head
> nor tail of the options available.
>
Try them. I've no idea how your screen is set up, but *for just
english* lat1-16.psfu.gz (so
Stupid question time.
What font would be appropriate for a British set up? I cannot make head
nor tail of the options available.
At least the keymap is nice and easy to work out :-)
Many thanks,
David Shaw
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfrom
