> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:03:08 + (GMT)
> From: ga ho
> Subject: LFS 6.5 Chapter 5.4. Binutils-2.19.1 - Pass 1
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Message-ID: <528515.66933...@web28615.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Hugh wrote:
> Thus I recommend that you create the symlink.
Unless you are doing multilib, which is recommened.
William
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above informa
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:03 AM, ga ho wrote:
> It states in chapter 5.4:
>
> If building on x86_64, create a symlink to ensure the sanity of the toolchain:
>
> case $(uname -m) in
> x86_64) mkdir -v /tools/lib && ln -sv lib /tools/lib64 ;;
> esac
>
> I just want to confirm. Do I still need to do
It states in chapter 5.4:
If building on x86_64, create a symlink to ensure the sanity of the toolchain:
case $(uname -m) in
x86_64) mkdir -v /tools/lib && ln -sv lib /tools/lib64 ;;
esac
I just want to confirm. Do I still need to do this If I am building the 32 bit
version of LFS on a 64bit
