Karthik Bhuvanagiri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the following error while setting up grub
>
> grub>setup (hd0)
> Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... no
> Checking if "/grub/stage1" exists... no
>Error 2: Bad file or directory t
Verified that stage1 file exists in /boot/grub directory. Still error comes
up. What could be the problem?
2011/7/30 Karthik Bhuvanagiri
> Hi,
>
> I get the following error while setting up grub
>
> grub>setup (hd0)
> Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" e
Hi,
I get the following error while setting up grub
grub>setup (hd0)
Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... no
Checking if "/grub/stage1" exists... no
Error 2: Bad file or directory type
same error even with grub>setup (hd0,2).
I've CD-ROM
On Sun Apr 22 23:18 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
>Could you give some details about partition type, and hard drive
(
>(P)ATA / SATA ).
>And you should check kernel configuration.
>Also, you could add the following option to the kernel line:
>vga=6
>which gives you more small lette
On Sun Apr 22 22:09 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>On 4/22/07, Alan Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This error can also be due to not having the correct filesystem
driver
>> builtin to your kernel. If hda3 is ext3 or ReiserFS or
something make
>> sure you have the right driver B
On 4/22/07, Dan D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun Apr 22 20:36 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
> >>
> >> The kernel is loading now, but I get another Error:
> >>
> >> VFS: Cannot open root device "hda3" or unknown-block(0,0)
> >> Please append a correct "root=" boot option
> >> K
Dan D. wrote:
>
> On Sun Apr 22 20:36 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
>>> The kernel is loading now, but I get another Error:
>>>
>>> VFS: Cannot open root device "hda3" or unknown-block(0,0)
>>> Please append a correct "root=" boot option
>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to
On Sun Apr 22 20:36 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>>
>> The kernel is loading now, but I get another Error:
>>
>> VFS: Cannot open root device "hda3" or unknown-block(0,0)
>> Please append a correct "root=" boot option
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
>> u
On Sun Apr 22 21:20 , 'Rick Shelton' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sent:
>
> setup (hd0)
> Checking if "/boot/grup/stage1" exists... no
> Checking if "/grup/stage1" exists... yes
> ...
>
>
>I noticed this typo. 'grup' should probably be 'grub'.
>hopefully it was just a typo whe
On 4/22/07, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Ahh, I understand. The mount point /boot doesn't exists at that
> >> time and root means the root directory (/), that resides on hda3.
> >>
> >> The kernel is loading now, but I get another Error:
> >>
> >> VFS: Cannot open root device "hda3" or
>> Ahh, I understand. The mount point /boot doesn't exists at that
>> time and root means the root directory (/), that resides on hda3.
>>
>> The kernel is loading now, but I get another Error:
>>
>> VFS: Cannot open root device "hda3" or unknown-block(0,0)
>> Please append a correct "root=" boot o
setup (hd0)
Checking if "/boot/grup/stage1" exists... no
Checking if "/grup/stage1" exists... yes
...
I noticed this typo. 'grup' should probably be 'grub'.
hopefully it was just a typo when copying into the email message.
but might be worth double checking if you
On 4/22/07, Joel Means <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This post didn't seem to make it to the list, so I am forwarding it now.
now it does :)
From: Dan D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun Apr 22 18:09 , Joel Means <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
> >Dan D. wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun Apr 22 16:55 , 'Tijnema !'
This post didn't seem to make it to the list, so I am forwarding it now.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Grub Setup
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:07:06 +0200
From: Dan D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun Apr 22 18:09 , Joel Me
On 4/22/07, Dan D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun Apr 22 19:12 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
> >> kernel /boot/lfskernel-2.6.16.38 root=/dev/hda1
> >>
> >> Error 15: File not found
> >>
> >> but /boot/lfskernel-2.6.16.38 exists!!
> >>
> >> what's wrong?
> >
> >That is because whe
On Sun Apr 22 19:12 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>> kernel /boot/lfskernel-2.6.16.38 root=/dev/hda1
>>
>> Error 15: File not found
>>
>> but /boot/lfskernel-2.6.16.38 exists!!
>>
>> what's wrong?
>
>That is because when the kernel is looking, only the boot
partition is
>virtually moun
On 4/22/07, Dan D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun Apr 22 16:55 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
> >On 4/22/07, Dan D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> setup (hd0)
> >> Checking if "/boot/grup/stage1" exists... no
> >> Checking if "/grup/stage1" exists... yes
> >>
Dan D. wrote:
>
> On Sun Apr 22 16:55 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>
>> On 4/22/07, Dan D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> setup (hd0)
>>> Checking if "/boot/grup/stage1" exists... no
>>> Checking if "/grup/stage1" exists... yes
>>> ...
>>>
>>> is this ok? I don't know,
On Sun Apr 22 16:55 , 'Tijnema !' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>On 4/22/07, Dan D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> setup (hd0)
>> Checking if "/boot/grup/stage1" exists... no
>> Checking if "/grup/stage1" exists... yes
>> ...
>>
>> is this ok? I don't know, I think it isn't, because th
Hello!
setup (hd0)
Checking if "/boot/grup/stage1" exists... no
Checking if "/grup/stage1" exists... yes
...
is this ok? I don't know, I think it isn't, because the LFS-Book
sais "If all went well, GRUB will have reported finding its files
in /boot/grub."
I've mounted
/dev/hda1 in $LFS/boot
On 4/22/07, Dan D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> setup (hd0)
> Checking if "/boot/grup/stage1" exists... no
> Checking if "/grup/stage1" exists... yes
> ...
>
> is this ok? I don't know, I think it isn't, because the LFS-Book
> sais "If all went well, GRUB will have reported finding it
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Alan Lord wrote:
> > as grub won't be able to install to a boot sector of a "virtual" disk
> >
> > it needs a physical device. Grub won't have loaded any drivers to make
> > the raid array visable at boot time
> >
> > you need a single disk really.
> >
> > Matt
> >
>
> I in
> as grub won't be able to install to a boot sector of a "virtual" disk
it needs a physical device. Grub won't have loaded any drivers to make
the raid array visable at boot time
you need a single disk really.
Matt
I installed grub on an old IBM Rackmount server with dual processors and
Subhash Chandra wrote:
AFAIK, grub is okay with H/W raid. I use raid 0 h/W raid. how ever
you need inbuilt raid drivers in kernel to actually use linux.
On 2/23/06, Titus Dingjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Darcy wrote:
/boot cannot reside on raid 0 5 or 6 paritions.
It's a hardware rai
AFAIK, grub is okay with H/W raid. I use raid 0 h/W raid. how ever
you need inbuilt raid drivers in kernel to actually use linux.
On 2/23/06, Titus Dingjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Darcy wrote:
> >/boot cannot reside on raid 0 5 or 6 paritions.
>
>
> It's a hardware raid5 on a compaq sma
Matt Darcy wrote:
>/boot cannot reside on raid 0 5 or 6 paritions.
It's a hardware raid5 on a compaq smart array 641 does that make it any
different?
<>--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above infor
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 2/22/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not a raid man, but I noticed a while back that RedHat extensively
patches grub, and a few of their patches specifically have to do with
grub.
Uh, specifically have to do with raid.
/boot cannot reside on raid 0 5
On 2/22/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not a raid man, but I noticed a while back that RedHat extensively
> patches grub, and a few of their patches specifically have to do with
> grub.
Uh, specifically have to do with raid.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs
On 2/22/06, Titus Dingjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> grub> device (hd0) /dev/cciss/c0d0
> Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0) (hd0)1+16 p (hd0,0)/boot/grub/stage2
> /boot/grub/menu.lst"... <1, 0, 512>[1]<2, 0, 512>[2]<2, 0,
> 7680>[2][3][4][5][6]
> [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]<
2fs, partition type 0x83
grub> device (hd0) /dev/cciss/c0d0
grub> setup (hd0)
Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes
Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes
Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes
Running "embed /boot/grub/e2fs
>rick wrote these words on 11/29/05 13:55 CST:
>
> Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs-stage1-5" exists ... no"
>Then Randy McMurchy wrote
>Did you copy this file into /boot/grub as the book instructs you to?
>
Nope, missed that, thanks to all who pointed it out.
Of course I broke something else, Im ge
On 11/30/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think what Thorsten meant was that for a ext{2,3} partition, you can
> boot just fine without having that file in place in your grub directory.
> I've done that several times. So that line shouldn't be a cause for
> concern.
That's inte
Jeremy Byron wrote:
thorsten wrote:
As far as I know, this stage1-5 is not needed.
Yes it is. The book tells you to copy the necessary stage1-5 files just
below the copy command for the stage 1/2 files. If you are following
the book, all you need is the e2fs-stage1-5 file. If you use reis
thorsten wrote:
Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists ... yes
Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists ... yes
Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs-stage1-5" exists ... no"
As far as I know, this stage1-5 is not needed.
Yes it is. The book tells you to copy the necessary stage1-5 files just
below t
> Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists ... yes
> Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists ... yes
> Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs-stage1-5" exists ... no"
As far as I know, this stage1-5 is not needed.
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfrom
On 11/29/05, rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally made it to 8.4 with apparent success, only took 4
> tries to get here, but I do have an error under grub when I
> do the setup (hd0,0) command I receive the message
>
> Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists ... yes
> Checking if "/boot/grub/s
rick wrote these words on 11/29/05 13:55 CST:
> Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs-stage1-5" exists ... no"
Did you copy this file into /boot/grub as the book instructs you to?
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Lin
Finally made it to 8.4 with apparent success, only took 4
tries to get here, but I do have an error under grub when I
do the setup (hd0,0) command I receive the message
Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists ... yes
Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists ... yes
Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs-st
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Jedediah Klusman wrote:
From my understanding grub syntax for dectecting the neccisary files is
root
(hdn,m) where n is the dev, and m is the partition. /dev/hda1 is my lfs
partition. However when i issue the command root (hd0,0) it come back with
no such drive or devic
From my understanding grub syntax for dectecting the neccisary files is root
(hdn,m) where n is the dev, and m is the partition. /dev/hda1 is my lfs
partition. However when i issue the command root (hd0,0) it come back with
no such drive or device. is this because the partition is mounted? an
Resolved.
I upgraded the host OS kernel to 2.6.10, ran the grub command and it was
successful.
From: "Zareh Aratoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: LFS Support List
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: grub setup Segmentation fault
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:09:35 -0800
, TAB
lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible
completions of a device/filename. ]
grub> root (hd0,2)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
grub> setup (hd0) Segmentation fault
root:/sources/grub-0.95#
The system is a Dell Power Edge 2850, with a
42 matches
Mail list logo
