On 3/23/06, Richard Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Perhaps the gcc problem I had is not common, maybe it was my error, but
> would it be a good idea to include in future books a gcc link test in
> chapter five, or at the beginning of chapter six. It certainly would
> have helped me, and s
Dan
I took your advice and re-built and installed gcc again and now
everything appears to be fine.
I still do not know what went wrong. I can't thank you enough for your
help.
Sorry about the email problem. Thunderbird appears to be playing up at
the moment.
Perhaps the gcc problem I had
On 3/22/06, Richard Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep 'ld-linux'
>
> The output is /lib/ld-linux.so.2 rather than /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2.
> Is this the problem, and if so how could it have happened?
Richard,
Please try to reply to the previous email. Each
OK, I pretty stumped. One last thing. Make sure that gcc itself is
actually linked correctly.
readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep 'ld-linux'
This should be /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 or obviously it won't
reference the correct location in the chroot.
--
Dan
The output is /lib/ld-linux.so.2 rathe
On 3/22/06, Richard Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. How about trying those commands outside the chroot. Then they'll
> be able to run, and we should be able to see what's happened.
>
> This is the output from the souped-up sanity check outside the chroot:-
OK, I pretty stumped. One l
OK. How about trying those commands outside the chroot. Then they'll
be able to run, and we should be able to see what's happened.
--
Dan
This is the output from the souped-up sanity check outside the chroot:-
[requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
attempt to open /tools/
On 3/22/06, Richard Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Third, let's try a souped up sanity check similar to the one in the SVN book.
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/readjusting.html
>
> echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
> cc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose &> dummy.log
>
> reade
On 3/22/06, Richard Melville http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support>> wrote:
/
/>/ The sanity check fails, as does gcc -dumpmachine. However, if I exit
/>/ the chroot environment and run the sanity check again, all is well. The
/>/ sanity check returns /tools/lib/ld-linux.so
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Richard Melville wrote:
Inside the chroot environment dummy.c will not compile and returns
*/tools/bin/cc: no such file or directory*, but it does, in reality, exist.
From outside chroot, 'ldd /tools/bin/gcc' - this sounds as if gcc is
linked against a library on the ho
/ Chapter 5 seems to have built OK, but glibc, the first package to be
/>/ compiled in chapter 6,
/>/ fails to configure, complaining that there is no such file as
/>/ /tools/bin/gcc, when there clearly is.
/>/
/>/ The sanity check fails, as does gcc -dumpmachine. However, if I exit
/>/ the c
On 3/22/06, Richard Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The sanity check fails, as does gcc -dumpmachine. However, if I exit
> the chroot environment and run the sanity check again, all is well. The
> sanity check returns /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 and gcc -dumpmachine
> returns i686-pc-linux-
>Chapter 5 seems to have built OK, but glibc, the first package to be
>compiled in chapter 6,
>fails to configure, complaining that there is no such file as
>/tools/bin/gcc, when there clearly is.
>
>The sanity check fails, as does gcc -dumpmachine. However, if I exit
>the chroot environment an
Richard Melville escreveu:
Hi
I'd really appreciate some help from somebody. I'm trying to build
LFS 6.1 with errata.
Chapter 5 seems to have built OK, but glibc, the first package to be
compiled in chapter 6,
fails to configure, complaining that there is no such file as
/tools/bin/gcc, when
Hi
I'd really appreciate some help from somebody. I'm trying to build LFS
6.1 with errata.
Chapter 5 seems to have built OK, but glibc, the first package to be
compiled in chapter 6,
fails to configure, complaining that there is no such file as
/tools/bin/gcc, when there clearly is.
The san
14 matches
Mail list logo
