Re: Glibc Testing Errors

2010-10-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
John Mitchell wrote: > FYI: The compiler segfault below created one of my test errors that I > reported earlier. -- This is one I guess I can legitimately ignore? > > Not sure about the remaining errors: > > make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) > make[2]: *** [/sour

Re: Glibc Testing Errors

2010-10-24 Thread John Mitchell
FYI: The compiler segfault below created one of my test errors that I reported earlier. -- This is one I guess I can legitimately ignore? Not sure about the remaining errors: make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock6.ou

Re: Glibc Testing Errors

2010-10-24 Thread John Mitchell
Hi, This is my first crack at LFS. I'm wandering if the error associated with the link below was ever resolved? *Previous and related errors:* http://www.mail-archive.com/lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org/msg14143.html *My setup:* - Book 6.7 - 64 bit -- athlon x2 - host kernel = 2.6.31

Re: Glibc Testing Errors: [SOLVED]--maybe

2010-07-14 Thread Dan McGhee
On 07/14/2010 04:35 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Dan McGhee wrote: > >> I did the rebuild of Chapter 5 make twice. Once using only the patch >> from Ch. 6 and then with both the patch and the sed command from Ch. 6. >> There was no change in the glibc tests. However, after applying the >> patch and

Re: Glibc Testing Errors: [SOLVED]--maybe

2010-07-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dan McGhee wrote: > On 07/14/2010 12:31 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Dan McGhee wrote: >> >>> I got some interesting results when I ran the glibc-2.11.2 test suite. >>> I'm conducting a 64-bit SVN build. >>> >>> These are the last three lines of the test log: >>> >>> make[1]: Target `c

Re: Glibc Testing Errors: [SOLVED]--maybe

2010-07-14 Thread Dan McGhee
On 07/14/2010 12:31 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Dan McGhee wrote: > >> I got some interesting results when I ran the glibc-2.11.2 test suite. >> I'm conducting a 64-bit SVN build. >> >> These are the last three lines of the test log: >> >> >>> make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of e

Re: Glibc Testing Errors

2010-07-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dan McGhee wrote: > Reading this I forgot to mention my host system. It's Ubuntu 10.04 and > I'm running Ubuntu's latest version of 2.6.32-23-generic (wish I hadn't > wiped out my CLFS build). I'm supplying this info now because in my > research I found some references in the LFS archives about

Re: Glibc Testing Errors

2010-07-14 Thread Dan McGhee
On 07/14/2010 12:31 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > If you do rebuild the Chapter 5 make and try the Chapter 6 glibc tests > again, I'd appreciate knowing the results. However, I don't think this > is what is causing the glibc test errors. I was able to duplicate at > least some of the errors on the c

Re: Glibc Testing Errors

2010-07-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dan McGhee wrote: > I got some interesting results when I ran the glibc-2.11.2 test suite. > I'm conducting a 64-bit SVN build. > > These are the last three lines of the test log: > >> make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glibc-2.11.2/gl

Glibc Testing Errors

2010-07-14 Thread Dan McGhee
I got some interesting results when I ran the glibc-2.11.2 test suite. I'm conducting a 64-bit SVN build. These are the last three lines of the test log: make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glibc-2.11.2/glibc-2.11.2' make: *** [check] Er