Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Ken Moffat
On 4 August 2010 23:46, Andrew Benton wrote: > On 04/08/10 20:42, Ken Moffat wrote: >> On 4 August 2010 19:23, Dan McGhee  wrote: >>> Does this mean that we should revert to make-3.81 and proceed merrily >>> from there?  Maybe just continue on with the current SVN and document >>> failures to the

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Andrew Benton
On 04/08/10 20:42, Ken Moffat wrote: > On 4 August 2010 19:23, Dan McGhee wrote: >> Does this mean that we should revert to make-3.81 and proceed merrily >> from there? Maybe just continue on with the current SVN and document >> failures to the list? I'm building x86_64 and there was a note on t

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Ken Moffat
On 4 August 2010 19:23, Dan McGhee wrote: > Does this mean that we should revert to make-3.81 and proceed merrily > from there?  Maybe just continue on with the current SVN and document > failures to the list?  I'm building x86_64 and there was a note on the > ticket that glibc built fine without

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Dan McGhee
On 08/04/2010 12:11 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > Yeah, I suspect make-3.82 will turn out to be too close to the > bleeding edge. AFAICS, only Mandriva are using it (not > necessarily for glibc, but make-3.82 is in 'cooker') and most > of us don't have a clue what needs to be changed. Does this mean tha

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Ken Moffat
On 4 August 2010 17:23, William Immendorf > Well, I don't know where the heck the patch came from, so I'll just > wait untill Matt gets the patch ready. But we would like it soon, as > I'm getting impatient for it... > Yeah, I suspect make-3.82 will turn out to be too close to the bleeding edge.

Re: Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread William Immendorf
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Dan McGhee wrote: > The patch is in the wget-list but I couldn't find it on any of the LFS > download sites.  Is there another way, about which I have forgotten, to > get it? Well, I don't know where the heck the patch came from, so I'll just wait untill Matt gets

Glibc Makefile_fix Patch Doesn't Appear to be Available for Download

2010-08-04 Thread Dan McGhee
Using SVN-20100803 at Chapter 5.2, Glibc-2.11.2. Applying the patch command for glibc-2.11.2-makefile_fix-1.patch failed with "No such file or directory." The patch is in the wget-list but I couldn't find it on any of the LFS download sites. Is there another way, about which I have forgotten,