On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Jim Gifford wrote:
Ken, That was a recent change.
I need to research the issue.
Heh, nothing to do with that. For the record, I managed to break the
xgcc sed in the gcc build for the target system (extraneous character
got into my script). On a non-multilib build, t
Ken, That was a recent change.
I need to research the issue.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above in
I've got a funny one here - built a x86_64 cross-tools and temporary
system on i686, but in installing the temporary system's gcc (section
6.4) it's screwed up - no libgcc_s.so.1 in /tools/lib, but a *32-bit*
version in /tools/lib64.
The cross-compiler in section 5.11 correctly installed lib
