On 15/03/10 04:58, Simon Geard wrote:
> That should be a very rare case, I think. Wireless devices will
> generally be named wlan* by the kernel, and wired devices will be eth*.
> That's the case on my desktop (with a wireless card), and on every
> laptop I've used in recent years...
>
It may be a
Simon Geard wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 17:19 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> that can be an issue on a laptop that has both wireless and wired nics.
>
> That should be a very rare case, I think. Wireless devices will
> generally be named wlan* by the kernel, and wired devices will be eth*.
> That
On 03/15/2010 12:58 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 17:19 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> that can be an issue on a laptop that has both wireless and wired nics.
>
> That should be a very rare case, I think. Wireless devices will
> generally be named wlan* by the kernel, and wired devic
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 17:19 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> that can be an issue on a laptop that has both wireless and wired nics.
That should be a very rare case, I think. Wireless devices will
generally be named wlan* by the kernel, and wired devices will be eth*.
That's the case on my desktop (wit
On Sunday 14 March 2010 16:19:30 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Trent Shea wrote:
> > I just ran a jhalfs build for lfs-6.6 and got hung up in chapter 7's
> > "configuring the network script" at the for command. There are no errors
> > reported, but no rule created either. I worked around this by booting to
Trent Shea wrote:
> I just ran a jhalfs build for lfs-6.6 and got hung up in chapter 7's
> "configuring the network script" at the for command. There are no errors
> reported, but no rule created either. I worked around this by booting to the
> new system and running the for command again.
>
>
Hi,
I just ran a jhalfs build for lfs-6.6 and got hung up in chapter 7's
"configuring the network script" at the for command. There are no errors
reported, but no rule created either. I worked around this by booting to the
new system and running the for command again.
If someone can confirm t
