Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-28 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:38:26PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > What was wrong with ken.moffat? Taken? > I've still just about got an account in my name at a previous isp - it gives out too much information to automated harvesting of addresses. So far, I haven't been invited to purchase a boo

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-28 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 8/28/2012 5:11 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:12:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat írta: zarniwhoop? :) LOL. Yes ? What's so funny ? Seriously - you only just noticed ? When I got broadband, all the good names were already taken. Apart from a long perio

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-28 Thread Baho Utot
On 08/28/2012 06:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: [putolin] > What was wrong with ken.moffat? LOL.I don't think anyone shoukd answer that. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:12:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Ken Moffat írta: >> >> zarniwhoop? :) LOL. >> > Yes ? What's so funny ? It just struck me that way. > Seriously - you only just noticed ? Yes. The address between the <> doesn't normally show on my emai

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-28 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:12:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Ken Moffat írta: > > zarniwhoop? :) LOL. > Yes ? What's so funny ? Seriously - you only just noticed ? When I got broadband, all the good names were already taken. Apart from a long period when I couldn't access the account

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-28 Thread William Harrington
On Aug 28, 2012, at 14:44 PM, Eleanore Boyd wrote: > On 8/28/2012 2:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Ken Moffat írta: >> zarniwhoop? :) LOL. >> >> -- Bruce > Indeed. Though my favorite line comes from a video game: "No one > likes a > smart ass." > :) > > Elly > I wouldn't expect Bruce to

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-28 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 8/28/2012 2:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Ken Moffat írta: > zarniwhoop? :) LOL. > > -- Bruce Indeed. Though my favorite line comes from a video game: "No one likes a smart ass." :) Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
> Ken Moffat írta: zarniwhoop? :) LOL. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-28 Thread x yyyyyy
Ken Moffat írta: >On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:28:13PM +0200, x yy wrote:> > Hi! > > > > I had been using LFS for half a year until I realized that keeping it > up-to-date is a pain. I feel I'd like to have some hard work again:), so now > I'm trying to upgrade that system.> > As far as I kn

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-17 Thread Richard Melville
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Richard Melville wrote: > > > > I do have a question, however, regarding vulnerabilities in old packages. > > Does anybody know of a good website that lists vulnerabilities as they > are > > found. That would enable us to replace just those packages in

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-17 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Richard Melville wrote: > > I do have a question, however, regarding vulnerabilities in old packages. > Does anybody know of a good website that lists vulnerabilities as they are > found. That would enable us to replace just those packages in old builds >

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-17 Thread Richard Melville
> Hi! > > > > I had been using LFS for half a year until I realized that keeping it > > up-to-date is a pain. I feel I'd like to have some hard work again:), > > so now I'm trying to upgrade that system. As far as I know It could > > be a failure, but definately not an easy task... I'm confused abo

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-15 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:28:13PM +0200, x yy wrote: > Hi! > > I had been using LFS for half a year until I realized that keeping it > up-to-date is a pain. I feel I'd like to have some hard work again:), so now > I'm trying to upgrade that system. > As far as I know It could be a failure,

Re: [lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-15 Thread Bruce Dubbs
x yy wrote: > Hi! > > I had been using LFS for half a year until I realized that keeping it > up-to-date is a pain. I feel I'd like to have some hard work again:), > so now I'm trying to upgrade that system. As far as I know It could > be a failure, but definately not an easy task... I'm confus

[lfs-support] upgrading 2-year-old sys

2012-08-15 Thread x yyyyyy
Hi! I had been using LFS for half a year until I realized that keeping it up-to-date is a pain. I feel I'd like to have some hard work again:), so now I'm trying to upgrade that system. As far as I know It could be a failure, but definately not an easy task... I'm confused about how to upgrade