On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 21:54 +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > (6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp
> > /lib; And this is where I found it confusing, ../usr/bin/cpp ==
> > $LFS/sources/usr/bin/cpp; but /usr/
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 21:54 +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> (6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp
> /lib; And this is where I found it confusing, ../usr/bin/cpp ==
> $LFS/sources/usr/bin/cpp; but /usr/bin/cpp isn't found in $LFS/sources.
> It's found is $LFS/u
Got it. Thanks.
It's relative to /lib, not $LFS/sources/gcc-build as I had thought
initially.
I'll have another look at ln(1).
On 03/21/2012 10:25 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:54:18PM +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
>> (6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I r
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:54:18PM +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> (6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp
> /lib; And this is where I found it confusing, ../usr/bin/cpp ==
> $LFS/sources/usr/bin/cpp; but /usr/bin/cpp isn't found in $LFS/sources.
> It's found is
Here's what I did to build gcc:
(1). Extracted the gcc archive within the $LFS/sources directory;
(2). cd'd into gcc-4.6.2;
(3). Ran the instructions from 6.17.1. Installation of GCC;
(4). Created $LFS/sources/gcc-build and cd'd into it;
(5). Configured and compiled gcc;
(6). While still in $LFS/so
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:50 +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> So in other words, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib' and 'ln
> -sv /usr/bin/cpp /lib' are equivalent?
Not quite, and the difference can be seen when you look at the link
*outside* the chroot environment (i.e where the filesystem is mounted
t
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:55:28 +
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> So in other words, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib' and 'ln -sv /usr/bin/cpp
> /lib' are equivalent?
ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib is a relative symbolic link.
ln -sv /usr/bin/cpp /lib is an absolute symbolic link.
Andy
--
http://linuxfrom
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Rick Shelton wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
>> wrote:
>>> While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
>>> '/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests creating this
>>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Rick Shelton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
> > While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
> > '/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests creating this
> > symlink, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/c
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
> '/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests creating this
> symlink, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib'. I assumed that I was supposed to run
> the command lin
While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
'/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests creating this
symlink, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib'. I assumed that I was supposed to run
the command line while still in '/sources/gcc-build'. If that is the case,
shouldn
11 matches
Mail list logo
