Re: [lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-27 Thread Emerson Yesupatham
Haid wrote: >>Hi Emerson, >>Thank your feedback, Emerson. >>I think I should correct you first. After binutils-2.22-Pass1 in Chapter 5 >>LFS 7.1, binutils are NOT picked up from the /tools directory: Emerson: In my previous mail I had shown my GCC pass 1 configure logs. I am putting it again here

Re: [lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-25 Thread Jasmine Iwanek
On 2012-08-26 02:40, Eleanore Boyd wrote: > On 8/25/2012 8:26 PM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote: >> Not quite true elly, configure has some code to search in certain >> relative paths from the prefix, if you take a look at the build logs >> you'll find lots of references like: >> >> checking for ld... >> >

Re: [lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-25 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 8/25/2012 8:26 PM, Jasmine Iwanek wrote: > On 2012-08-25 16:10, Eleanore Boyd wrote: >> On 8/25/2012 10:02 AM, Hadi wrote: >> >>> Hi Emerson, >>> >>> Thank your feedback, Emerson. >>> >>> I think I should correct you first. After binutils-2.22-Pass1 in >>> Chapter 5 LFS 7.1, binutils are NOT pic

Re: [lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-25 Thread Jasmine Iwanek
On 2012-08-25 16:10, Eleanore Boyd wrote: > On 8/25/2012 10:02 AM, Hadi wrote: > >> Hi Emerson, >> >> Thank your feedback, Emerson. >> >> I think I should correct you first. After binutils-2.22-Pass1 in >> Chapter 5 LFS 7.1, binutils are NOT picked up from the /tools >> directory: >> >> PATH= PAT

Re: [lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-25 Thread Hadi
Hi Maybe the question now is how to use the installation of binutils-2.22-Pass1 when running of GCC-4.6.2-Pass1 in Chapter 5 of LFS BOOK 7.1 since in /tools/bin directory there are only these binutils with prefix $LFS_TGT-. Perhaps it is very difficult to investigate. Bruce, could you please h

Re: [lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-25 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 8/25/2012 10:02 AM, Hadi wrote: Hi Emerson, Thank your feedback, Emerson. I think I should correct you first. After binutils-2.22-Pass1 in Chapter 5 LFS 7.1, binutils are NOT picked up from the /tools directory: PATH= PATH=/tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin In /tools/bin, there is only $LFS_TGT-*

Re: [lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-25 Thread Hadi
Hi Emerson, Thank your feedback, Emerson. I think I should correct you first. After binutils-2.22-Pass1 in Chapter 5 LFS 7.1, binutils are NOT picked up from the /tools directory: PATH= PATH=/tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin In /tools/bin, there is only $LFS_TGT-* tools as following in my X86 virtual b

Re: [lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-25 Thread Emerson Yesupatham
Hi Hadi, Hadi wrote: >>So I want to know that in Chapter 5 why the binutils-2.22-Pass1 is the pre >>requisite for GCC-4.6.2-Pass1 since GCC-4.6.2-Pass1 still uses those of the >>host. Emerson: I am using LFS BOO 7.0 currently, but I believe tool chain mechanism beteween 7.0 and 7.1 should be sam

Re: [lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-23 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 8/23/2012 9:13 AM, ??? wrote: Hi, I am very confused about tool chain technique, especially when digesting more details. In LFS-7.1 chapter 5 (constructing a temporary system) the book says "Binutils is installed first because the *configure *runs of both GCC and Glibc perform various fea

[lfs-support] lfs tool chain technique LFS-7.1

2012-08-23 Thread 余海峰
Hi, I am very confused about tool chain technique, especially when digesting more details. In LFS-7.1 chapter 5 (constructing a temporary system) the book says “Binutils is installed first because the configure runs of both GCC and Glibc perform various feature tests on the assembler and linker to