Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-11 Thread Qrux
On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:56 AM, wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 04:19 -0700, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote: >>> But my REAL puzzle is the PERL thing I'm addressing here happens pretty >>> early in the big picture, and AFTER a very global chown -R lfs /tools >>> and chown -R lfs /sources I'm build

Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-10 Thread jasonpsage
>>On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 04:19 -0700, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote: >> But my REAL puzzle is the PERL thing I'm addressing here happens pretty >> early in the big picture, and AFTER a very global chown -R lfs /tools >> and chown -R lfs /sources >If copying a file to /tools/bin gives permission errors

Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-09 Thread Simon Geard
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 04:19 -0700, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote: > But my REAL puzzle is the PERL thing I'm addressing here happens pretty > early in the big picture, and AFTER a very global chown -R lfs /tools > and chown -R lfs /sources If copying a file to /tools/bin gives permission errors when

Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata - solved

2012-01-09 Thread jasonpsage
Bruce, I THINK I solved the Perl Script issue. I added one more chown to the previously made /tools I'm not sure but I hope it's a reasonable move. I checked and I am logged in as the suggest users. This fix did allow me to set the perl section back to the original. Here is the new Changes Logg

Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-09 Thread jasonpsage
>>On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 18:03 -0700, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote: >> I'm doing a few things there - but I do set up that sim link - but I >> don't quite understand it >> because for what you describe, my small mind thinks it should be written >> >> >> ln -s $LFS/tools /tools >> >> But I'm sure i

Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-09 Thread Simon Geard
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 18:03 -0700, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote: > I'm doing a few things there - but I do set up that sim link - but I > don't quite understand it > because for what you describe, my small mind thinks it should be written > > > ln -s $LFS/tools /tools > > But I'm sure its me jus

Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
jasonps...@jegas.com wrote: > This is the code I execute for that: (Above is a export LFS=/mnt/lfs for > good measure too) > > #-- > # LFS Chapater 3 thru 4.2 - Making tools Dir and the symlink > # Also testing MD4 Check

Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-08 Thread jasonpsage
>> >> In the Code for installing perl, just after the make command, there is a >> line of code that reads: >> >> cp -v perl cpan/podlators/pod2man /tools/bin >> >> However at this stage in the LFS 7.0 process, we aren't in chroot >> >> I made the following change for this line and I hope its accomp

Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-08 Thread Matijn Woudt
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:36 AM, wrote: > > In the Code for installing perl, just after the make command, there is a > line of code that reads: > > cp -v perl cpan/podlators/pod2man /tools/bin > > However at this stage in the LFS 7.0 process, we aren't in chroot > > I made the following change for

Re: [lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-08 Thread jasonpsage
>In the Code for installing perl, just after the make command, there is a >line of code that reads: > >cp -v perl cpan/podlators/pod2man /tools/bin > >However at this stage in the LFS 7.0 process, we aren't in chroot > >I made the following change for this line and I hope its accomplishing >the ri

[lfs-support] LFS - 5.29 - perl-5.14.2 - possible errata

2012-01-08 Thread jasonpsage
In the Code for installing perl, just after the make command, there is a line of code that reads: cp -v perl cpan/podlators/pod2man /tools/bin However at this stage in the LFS 7.0 process, we aren't in chroot I made the following change for this line and I hope its accomplishing the right thin