On 04/07/2014 06:53 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> William Immendorf wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook.
>>>
>>> I'll see what I can do.
>> I've looked at the patch briefly. I'm pretty sure that using rm to
>> remove an execut
William Immendorf wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook.
>>
>> I'll see what I can do.
> I've looked at the patch briefly. I'm pretty sure that using rm to
> remove an executable is a bad idea in a system that might not always
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook.
>
> I'll see what I can do.
I've looked at the patch briefly. I'm pretty sure that using rm to
remove an executable is a bad idea in a system that might not always
have package management. I'd also
baho utot wrote:
>
> On 04/07/2014 08:03 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Do you want to submit a patch?
> Attached is the patch
LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook.
I'll see what I can do.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfroms
On 04/07/2014 08:03 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 09:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was pr
baho utot wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2014 09:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> baho utot wrote:
>>> On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
> the configure should be:
>
> ./configure --disable-nologin
>
> as nologin was previ
On 04/06/2014 09:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> baho utot wrote:
>> On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>>> On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
>>>
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
>>>
baho utot wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>> On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
>>
>>> the configure should be:
>>>
>>> ./configure --disable-nologin
>>>
>>> as nologin was previously installed by shadow
>>
>> Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
>
>> the configure should be:
>>
>> ./configure --disable-nologin
>>
>> as nologin was previously installed by shadow
>
> Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is
> desired be
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
> the configure should be:
>
> ./configure --disable-nologin
>
> as nologin was previously installed by shadow
Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is
desired because util-linux ships a better nologin binary.
Coreutils w
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
11 matches
Mail list logo
