-Original Message-From: kb0...@berzerkula.orgSent: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:13:58 -0500To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.orgSubject: Re: [lfs-support] Creating the /etc/fstab FileOn Jun 11, 2013, at 9:45 PM, John Black wrote:Kernel panic, probably it's from fstab file.Kernel panics
-Original Message-From: kb0...@berzerkula.orgSent: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:13:58 -0500To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.orgSubject: Re: [lfs-support] Creating the /etc/fstab FileOn Jun 11, 2013, at 9:45 PM, John Black wrote:Kernel panic, probably it's from fstab file.Kernel panics
On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:45 PM, John Black wrote:
Kernel panic, probably it's from fstab file.
Kernel panics don't know about /etc/fstab.
Kernel panics mean that you don't have the proper drivers in the
running kernel.
If it is a vfs issue about mounting root fs and unkno
Go to the Gentoo or Arch Linux web sight they have info on how to create
the /etc/fstab file. You won't learn much by having someone do it for you.
On Jun 11, 2013 9:46 PM, "John Black" wrote:
> Linux From Scratch - Version 7.3 Chapter 8. Making the LFS System Bootable
> 8
Linux From Scratch - Version 7.3 Chapter 8. Making the LFS System Bootable 8.2.
Creating the /etc/fstab File
---
sda1 Boot Primary vfat
Baho Utot wrote:
> I found this error in the book
>
> It is possible to make the ext3 filesystem reliable across power
> failures for some hard disk types. To do this, add the barrier=1 mount
> option to the appropriate entry in /etc/fstab. To check if the disk
> drive su
I found this error in the book
It is possible to make the ext3 filesystem reliable across power
failures for some hard disk types. To do this, add the barrier=1 mount
option to the appropriate entry in /etc/fstab. To check if the disk
drive supports this option, run hdparm on the
GRUB linux line unless you use an
> initrd. My partition allocation is almost the same as yours. Unlike
> others, I do like to put some things on /opt (Xorg, KDE, Qt, JDK,
> others). -- Bruce
Got it. Thanks. I've modified my /etc/fstab file as suggested by Ken.
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> I'd appreciate it if somebody could please have a look at my /etc/fstab
> file shown below and let me know if it's OK. I've searched this mailing
> list's archives and an example /etc/fstab I found was a bit different to
> mine. I a
; the rootfs, the kernel will try to use whatever root= you passed on
> the commandline from grub : here UUID will NOT work (we don't use an
> initrd) - and what is shown in /etc/fstab for '/' is at best
> documentation.
>
While reading the man page for fstab(5), I got t
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 09:27:03PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> I'd appreciate it if somebody could please have a look at my /etc/fstab
> file shown below and let me know if it's OK. I've searched this mailing
> list's archives and an example /etc/fstab I
I'd appreciate it if somebody could please have a look at my /etc/fstab
file shown below and let me know if it's OK. I've searched this mailing
list's archives and an example /etc/fstab I found was a bit different to
mine. I also had a look at the /etc/fstab files on
On 10/11/2010 08:39 AM, Neal Murphy wrote:
> Binutils are getting better at recognizing a filesystem and loading its
> module(s) as needed before mounting it; it wasn't always thus. Regardless of
> that, there are two consumers of /etc/fstab: the computer, and the admin; it
> nee
: FW: Re: FW: Re: "auto" in /etc/fstab
>
> On 10/10/2010 01:05 PM, rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
> > --- Original Message ---
> > From: Bruce Dubbs[ mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com ]
> > Sent: 10/9/2010 7:36:52 PM
> > To : lfs-support@linu
--- Original Message ---
>From: rhubarbpie...@gmail.com[mailto:rhubarbpie...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10/10/2010 11:12:48 AM
To : rhubarb...@poetworld.net
Cc :
Subject : FW: Re: FW: Re: "auto" in /etc/fstab
On 10/10/2010 01:05 PM, rhubarb...@poetwo
Jonathan Arnold wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:18:30 -0500
> rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
>
>> Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
>> /etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list
>> them all as auto?
>
> A
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:18:30 -0500
rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
>
> Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
> /etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list
> them all as auto?
About the only reason you wouldn't have something
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 16:18 -0500, rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
> Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
> /etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
> all as auto?
I may be wrong, but I *think* auto works only for filesystems
On 09/30/2010 07:52 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM, wrote:
>>
>> Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
>> /etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
>> all as auto?
That's a go
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM, wrote:
>
> Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
> /etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
> all as auto?
I don't really know the answer to your question but if it's of
interest the
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
all as auto?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Well thanks again. I have 4 gig of memory, so for now I will just go without
swap.
--- On Wed, 2/10/10, Andrew Benton wrote:
> From: Andrew Benton
> Subject: Re: Setting up /etc/fstab
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 4:59 PM
> On
oping to keep my Centos system and have the option of booting to LFS.
> Is that possible?
>
The only way to know is to try it. For what it's worth, it's not
essential for /etc/fstab to be perfect to boot. The kernel mounts
whatever partition grub tells it to mount. If that confli
> If you are using LVM, then you need an initrd and that is
> out of scope
> for LFS.
>
> -- Bruce
> --
But once I boot to the kernel I built for LFS, won't LVM be out of the
picture? I went into gparted and I think I found the device that is swap,
I think its /dev/sda2 and my '/' partiti
to point to the
> partition with LFS on it and boot. So I am at the point to create
> /etc/fstab and its looking for the root partition and swap devices.
> Here are my present two lines for the root and swap on Centos:
>
> /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3defaults
boot. So I am at the
point to create /etc/fstab and its looking for the root partition and swap
devices. Here are my present two lines for the root and swap on Centos:
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3defaults 1 1
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swap swap
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 1/26/06, Matt Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I boot into my LFS host distro (Slack 10.2).
Warning - Slackware <10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
first build you may want to consider a better host distro
He's using Slack 10.2. Why is that a problem?
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:34:48 +0100
Clemens Haupt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clemens,
I realise that you are helping another German speaker. However this
list is English. If you give him bad advice we can't correct it if we
didn't understand it. Please stick to English on the lists and mail
On Thursday 26 January 2006 12:27, you wrote:
>Le Jeudi 26 Janvier 2006 11:41, Matt Darcy a écrit :
>> Warning - Slackware <10 has problems acting as a build host. For
>> your first build you may want to consider a better host distro
>Humm. I spent the best part of the morning installing a comforta
e, I reboot on my LFS partition and work on it for
> a bit.)
Das find ich nicht so gut, ich hab's ausprobiert, weil sich die meisten
Befehle im Buch auf $LFS beziehen und das soll /mnt/lfs sein.
Irgendwo hakelt es früher oder später.
>To get more comfortable, I want to put /dev/hd
On 1/26/06, Luca Dionisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quoting Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > Well, although I really like Slack 10.2 as an everyday distro, I'm not
> > particularly anal about using it as a host system. After reading various
>
> IMHO, you can have a try using your
On 1/26/06, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'd like eventually is a basic One-CD-distro that builds LFS out of the
> box. I know that there is a LiveCD, but I'll often reboot during breaks to do
> 30 minutes or an hour of LFS there and then, and I think a host system
> installed on h
Quoting Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Warning - Slackware <10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
> > first build you may want to consider a better host distro
>
> He's using Slack 10.2. Why is that a problem? I've never heard this before.
>
Well, although I really like S
On 1/26/06, Matt Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I boot into my LFS host distro (Slack 10.2).
>
> Warning - Slackware <10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
> first build you may want to consider a better host distro
He's using Slack 10.2. Why is that a problem? I've never hear
Hi Niki
Warning - Slackware <10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
first build you may want to consider a better host distro
Humm. I spent the best part of the morning installing a comfortable build
host. Anybody on the list tried to build LFS 6.1.1 with a Slack 10.2 host?
I su
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Le Jeudi 26 Janvier 2006 11:41, Matt Darcy a écrit :
Warning - Slackware <10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
first build you may want to consider a better host distro
Humm. I spent the best part of the morning installing a comfortable buil
Le Jeudi 26 Janvier 2006 11:41, Matt Darcy a écrit :
> Warning - Slackware <10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
> first build you may want to consider a better host distro
Humm. I spent the best part of the morning installing a comfortable build
host. Anybody on the list tried to bui
On 1/26/06, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /dev/hda6/mnt/lfsext2 defaults* *
>
> Question: what shall I put in place of the asterisks? Some entries do have 0,
> 1
> or 2 value. I don't know what these mean. Are they of any importance?
Try "man fstab" ( or else "
I boot into my LFS host distro (Slack 10.2).
Warning - Slackware <10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
first build you may want to consider a better host distro
/dev/hda6/mnt/lfsext2 defaults* *
Question: what shall I put in place of the asterisks? Som
o get more comfortable, I want to put /dev/hda6 in /etc/fstab, so it is
automatically mounted every time I boot into my LFS host distro (Slack 10.2). I
have this, so far:
/dev/hda6/mnt/lfsext2 defaults* *
Question: what shall I put in place of the asterisks? Some entries do
> > can't open /etc/fstab: No such file or directory
>
> This is mentioned in the book, right below the mount commands.
I didn't look on next page, I was expecting to be pre-warned, oh well it
was stupid after all. Thanks for the pointer.
-Ross-
--
http://linuxf
can't open /etc/fstab: No such file or directory
now I don't remember making fstab in a previous section, and wasn't
expecting this warning. Is it an expected warning or have I done
something wrong?
-Ross-
This is mentioned in the book, right below the mount commands.
--
http://
Hello,
I hope this question doesn't turn out to be a stupid as my last one but
here goes anyway. I hav got to page 103 of the LFS book(6.1) and am
mounting the virtual kernel files on the new filesystem with
mount -t devpts -o gid=4,mode=620 none /dev/pts
I get a warning
can't open
43 matches
Mail list logo
