try from your side. Is that the case?
2. do you have an /etc/suauth file? If yes, post the not commented lines
3. post the output of either
ip link show
or
ifconfig
If I remember correctly, in my case the loopback device was down and su
at this time seemed to use it.
thorsten
--
http://linuxf
ad of the stack
have fun,
thorsten
--- gcc-4.7.2/gcc/ifcvt.c-o 2013-01-16 15:07:24.611752676 +0100
+++ gcc-4.7.2/gcc/ifcvt.c 2013-01-16 15:07:29.379752535 +0100
@@ -2853,8 +2853,10 @@
register. */
max_reg = max_reg_num ();
size = (max_reg + 1) * sizeof (rtx);
- then_va
> As far as drivers, disable what you
> don't need and enable what yo do need.
> William Harrington
Two hints I got some time ago, which helped me a lot:
1: get a recent distro, boot it up, do
dmesg > dmesg.log,
look at dmesg.log with eg. vim and look at the kernel bootmessages for
the hardwar
> That reminds me: IIRC the default for tar is gzip, not bzip? And the
> "default" suffix would be ".tgz"? I guess it's time to go back and
> review some docs! :-(( UGH!
man tar
-j use bzip
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs
t; small subset first.
I use
mount --bind / /mnt/sys-bkup
cd /mnt/sys-bkup/
tar -cpvjf /mnt/backup/backup.tar.bz2 ./*
to backup my systems, which does work well.
The bind mount is nice IMO because you don't copy any mounted
subfilesystems with it. No /proc /sys /dev pseudo fil
> $ make -j1 -f client.mk configure
> $ make -j4 -f client.mk build
>
> Then you only have to slow down a little to wait for the configure
> steps to complete (which is the same as any autotooled package,
> anyway).
another way is:
make -j1 -f client.mk build
using
mk_add_option
like it belongs to postfix. Have you upgraded postfix before the
system got unstable?
A second guess would be to just fetch a new kernel version and try that
one. In case your kernel is the problem.
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ce still in /usr/src/linux-2.6.22.5 ?
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
enable the support in the kernel yes it does.
>
> Jaqui
>
And if enabled, try this:
when building any package which takes a while to build, time how long it
takes to compile with
a) make
and
b) make -j 10
the second one should give you a speedy experience...
thorsten
--
http://linuxf
need for
finding the binary via PATH
have fun
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> where could i have missed to copy/install that file?
Hi,
have a look at chapter 5.12 Binutils. ld-new is installed there.
Something must have gone wrong here.
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscr
> /bin/sh: sh: command not found
Hi,
what does
export | grep PATH
output?
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> ftp> ls
> 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV.
> 425 Failed to establish connection.
Hi,
I know it is obvious but nevertheless: *did* you try to use passive mode?
*without* passive:
230 Login successful.
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> ls
20
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 5/25/06, thorsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> a shorter way is
>>
>> perl -e 'print 0x315'
>>
>> or
>>
>> python -c 'print 0x315'
>>
>> however the more explanatory w
ion with e.g. the LFS-live-CD and restoring the tared-up LFS
system on this new partition?
regards, Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
thorsten wrote:
> I forgot:
> to test for the loopback device within the kernel, do:
> cat /boot/config-[YOUR KERNEL CONFIG FILE] | grep CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP
>
> should give you
>
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y
>
> if not, compile a new kernel, with loopback enabled
>
I forgot:
to test for the loopback device within the kernel, do:
cat /boot/config-[YOUR KERNEL CONFIG FILE] | grep CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP
should give you
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y
if not, compile a new kernel, with loopback enabled
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs
enter and then WAIT WAIT WAIT...
after some time (minutes) the password prompt should appear, enter
password. You should then be logged in.
Then it is time to figure out, what went wrong with your Network setup.
have you loopback enabled within the kernel config?
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratc
Just a guess: as far as I know, Ubuntu uses gcc-4.xx. Maybe you should
try to use a System with gcc-3.xx.
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
e but not necessary. (no, alfs
> is not the solution ;)
lfs-bootable-cd hint, combined with tarballs of the system, which you
want to install and copy them over. Or is that too easy/unflexible?
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscr
p. Not installing for
example libc-headers is not a good idea ;-)
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Jeremy Henty wrote:
> I compiled Linux From Scratch and all I got was this lousy command
> line!
Some like it lousy!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists ... yes
> Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists ... yes
> Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs-stage1-5" exists ... no"
As far as I know, this stage1-5 is not needed.
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratc
if this is going to work.
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
tead ofexport TCLPATH='pwd'
it should be export TCLPATH=`pwd`
if you do echo $TCLPATH
the first one gives you: pwd
the second one: /mnt/lfs/source/tcl8.4.9
I suggest that you just do: export TCLPATH="/mnt/lfs/source/tcl8.4.9"
and continue with cha
are not very familiar with linux at
this time and know what you are doing).
Have fun
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
rong?
Best regards,
David Ciecierski
Just a guess here, I had a similar problem Months ago. The fix was to
enable the loopback interface, as login seems to communicate via loopback.
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.h
instead of user lfs then a
cat > ~/.bash_profile << "EOF"
creates the file .bash_profile in the /root/ directory instead of
/home/lfs/. So logging in as user lfs there is no .bash_profile which
can be read.
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lf
and make sure both files look exactly like
in the lfs book. In .bash.profile the >>> -i <<< in the env command is
important. That one may be missing.
have fun,
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.htm
Joel Miller wrote:
thorsten wrote:
Hello all,
I have a lfs-router with two ethernet cards, which connects via pppoe
on eth0 to my adsl provider. eth1 has 192.168.0.1/24, my private
subnet. On the subnet is 192.168.0.3, named linux. Now the following
problem arises and I have no clue what is
correct here and this helps
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
uting
***
table looks good and typing ping 192.168.0.3 instead of ping linux works
as it should.
Thank you for comments,
thorsten happel
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
LFS 6.0 - Is it necessary to populate dev every time you enter the chroot env.
Yes, prior entering you have to check that:
$LFS/proc
$LFS/sys
is mounted.
Do the fake mounts:
mount -f -t ramfs ramfs $LFS/dev
mount -f -t tmpfs tmpfs $LFS/dev/shm
mount -f -t devpts -o gid=4,mode=620 devpts $LFS/dev
script again and check that strstr is found:
./configure --prefix=/tools > temp
cat temp | grep -n strstr
my output looks like:
checking for strstr... (cached) yes
checking proper strstr implementation... yes
if that is not the case, I assume, you have a glibc problem
regards thorsten
#ifn
34 matches
Mail list logo
