On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Fernando de Oliveira
wrote:
> --- Em sáb, 26/1/13, Ken Moffat escreveu:
>
> > De: Ken Moffat
> > Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] Cannot boot into LFS install
> > Para: "LFS Support List"
> > Data: Sábado, 26 de Janeiro de 2013, 13:20
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 06:29:4
13, 23:28
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:18:45PM
> > -0500, matthew gruda wrote:
> > > Oops, pressed the wrong button. Anyway, i used
> > "update-grub" from the host
> > > system and it detected the LFS install and got this
> > output:
> &g
e
then, I rebooted into the LFS install and got this error upon booting:
VFS: Cannot open root device "sda1" or unknown-block(0,0) error -6
...
Kernel Panic - not syncing unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:13 PM, matthew gruda wrote:
> I i
I installed LFS next to an existing Ubuntu installation. The Ubuntu
install put /boot on the same partition as the rest of the os. I
successfully compiled and installed all the packages, and used
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> matthew gruda wrote:
>
> >> What is the result of:
> >>
> >> $ find /tools -name ld\* -type f -exec ls -l {} \;
>
> > i got :
> > root:/# find /tools -name ld\* -type f -exec ls -l {} \;
> &
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> matthew gruda wrote:
>
> We prefer you not top post.
>
> > $ cat `dirname $(gcc --print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs:
>
> That looks OK.
>
> > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs
>
)
-plugin-opt=-fresolution=%u.res
%{!nostdlib:%{!nodefaultlibs:%:pass-through-libs(%(link_gcc_c_sequence))}}
}}%{flto|flto=*:% wrote:
> First add a subject
>
> matthew gruda wrote:
> > now i got up to 6.10 and i tried:
> > echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
> > cc dum
-C ld clean
> make -C ld LIB_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib
> cp -v ld/ld-new /tools/bin
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2013, at 11:48 AM, matthew gruda wrote:
>
> im fairly sure i did everything for 64 bit though...
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Roy Birk wrote:
>
>> It
eed to start over and be sure to follow the parts of the
> book for 64-bit systems, but hopefully one of the gurus will respond if
> I've said anything incorrect.
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2013, at 11:20 AM, matthew gruda wrote:
>
> so how do i fix this?
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013
so how do i fix this?
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Roy Birk wrote:
> I think it's because you're on a 64-bit system.
>
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2013, at 8:51 AM, matthew gruda wrote:
>
> > now i got up to 6.10 and i tried:
> > echo 'main(){}' >
now i got up to 6.10 and i tried:
echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
cc dummy.c -v -Wl, --verbose
and got:
GNU assembler version 2.22 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) using BFD version
(GNU Binutils) 2.22
COMPILER_PATH=/tools/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/:/tools/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> matthew gruda wrote:
> > When I try to compile gcc from 5.5 I get this after running make:
> >
> > checking for complex.h... yes
> > checking for library containing creal... -lm
> > checking whether crea
When I try to compile gcc from 5.5 I get this after running make:
checking for complex.h... yes
checking for library containing creal... -lm
checking whether creal, cimag and I can be used... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking for gettimeofday...
13 matches
Mail list logo
