Le Lundi, 20 Juin 2011 12:05:56 -0500,
Mike McCarty a écrit :
> A 64 bit machine which is 32 bit capable, is a completely
> different machine in 32 bit mode than it is in 64 bit mode.
>
> For purposes of compiling, etc. the two modes were effectively
> entirely different computers. The fact that
Le Dimanche, 19 Juin 2011 21:55:28 -0500,
Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> lanas wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > How would one achieve that ? I recently built a LFS system on a
> > 64-bit host, and all binaries turned out to be 64-bit. I'd like to
> > build and ru
Hello all,
How would one achieve that ? I recently built a LFS system on a
64-bit host, and all binaries turned out to be 64-bit. I'd like to
build and run a 32-bit LFS system. Is there a way of doing that on a
64-bit host ?
- thanks for any suggestions/hints/comments.
--
http://linuxfrom
Hello all,
I noticed tha the recent LFS has a GDBM dependency for building
Perl. This was not the case in 6.4. I'd like to know what is this
dependency about and, if it's possible to build Perl w/o it.
Thanks,
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxf
Le Dimanche, 09 Mars 2008 17:34:04 -0400,
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> All the final system packages (i.e., the ones in chapter 6 in LFS)
> should (ideally) be built natively. Whether you use CLFS or LFS, this
> is going to be the case.
Obviously I haven't read the CLFS book f
Folks,
I'm still unclear about the very simple following thing. I've built
successfully a LFS system using VmWare running a 32-bit version of
Fedora 8. That's all sweet and nice. The host is Fedora Core 6
x86_64. I'm about to embark on building a x86_64 version using CLFS
but, I'm wondering
Le Mardi, 06 Mars 2008 02:03:34 +,
support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > That could be a VmWare question but I figure LFS users who are
> > using VmWare surely have bumped into this before. How can one
> > switch from one console to another ? On a real machine we use
> > Ctrl-Alt-F2 fo
Hello,
That could be a VmWare question but I figure LFS users who are using
VmWare surely have bumped into this before. How can one switch from
one console to another ? On a real machine we use Ctrl-Alt-F2 for
instance. With VmWare this does not work as the host picks it up. Is
it possible t
Le Mardi, 4 Mars 2008 12:57:23 +1300,
"Steve Crosby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>> Is completing the halt cycle something to do with ACPI options of
>> the kernel ?
> in brief, yes - the VMWare virtual machine does not receive a
> "power-off" ACPI command, and therefore sits waiting. If you
Hi all,
LFS system works fine but, how would it be possible to give abck
control to the machine after a halt of the system is made ? By this I
mean, when the system is issued 'halt' it will indeed halt, VmWare does
not seem so perceive that the system has stopped running, the result
being that
Hi all,
When booting a stock LFS system using VmWare (eg. that normally runs
Fedora) the resulting text screen is rather small. Is there some
parameter, perhaps a kernel parameter, or a font modification that
could make the text/console screen larger ?
Thanks.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/m
Le Samedi, 23 Février 2008 18:57:09 +0100,
Thomas Trepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> You may try
>
> echo "root:newpasswd" | chpasswd
>
> when you are in the chroot environment. This sets the password to
> "newpasswd" for user root.
Although this does not solve the problem, it is a han
Le Samedi, 23 Février 2008 09:58:07 -0800,
"Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>> I chroot into the freshly-built LFS system and then I issue the
>> 'passwd' command. But then all of the lines below appears as if I
>> typed something and then passwd exits.
> I think this comes down
Hello,
There's an uncommon problem with trying to modify the root password at
the end of building a LFS 6.3 system. I'm sure this does not pertain
to LFS and something must be not quite right. I've never seen this
before.
The passwd and shadow files are as per the book, and the pwconv and
g
Folks,
I'm going through LFS 6.3. Last time I've built and used LFS systems
was about 4 years ago. Comparing with my notes I see that now in
Chap. 06 the devices are bind-mounted from the host instead of creating
a few of them as it was the case before.
What is the rationale for doing this
On Wednesday, 30 January 2008 15:20:39 +0200,
"Ag. D. Hatzimanikas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> Yes, but the patch is comment out in the XML sources.
Indeed. I should pay more attention (and get a XML text highlighting
module for emacs).
Al
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lf
Folks,
While grinding the installation I noticed that there's a difference
between the XML and HTML files regarding the procedure to install
ncurses in LFS 6.3, chapter 6.
The XML has the rollup patch whereas the HTMl does not mention it.
The batch of files to download for that LFS version doe
Hi there,
Just compiling the latest stable LFS and happened to look at the
compile console during gcc (chap 05) and saw Firefox being mentionned
in there, scrolling rapidly away.
What ? What does Firefox have to do with gcc or rather, what does
gcc have to do with Firefox ? Do they have a n
Le Samedi, 15 Septembre 2007 13:53:03 -0700 (PDT),
Richard Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Hi,
> Hi Al, I am using wifi on the laptop and I can ping the LiveCD box.
> I haven't tried using ssh yet. Can you elaborate on the wifi setup?
> If I can ping, surely I have comms and can run ssh?
Le Vendredi, 14 Septembre 2007 19:17:09 -0700 (PDT),
Richard Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> I think ssh is on my CD. I'll be able to use that.
> Just have to figure out how to use it!
My two very basic cents: boot the machine from the CD. Enable
networking. From the laptop, use ssh li
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:59:44 -0700,
lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> > I have a (potentially stupid) question. Can I simply use a X86_64
> > and follow the LFS instructions to build a system (taking care to
> > configure the kernel for 64 bits operation) ? I mean, do I have to
> > be concern
Folks,
I have a (potentially stupid) question. Can I simply use a X86_64 and
follow the LFS instructions to build a system (taking care to configure
the kernel for 64 bits operation) ? I mean, do I have to be concerned
with cross LFS if the system I'm building using the X86_64 will run on
the s
Folks,
Using VMware, I've installed LFS from the Live CD 6.1.1 (nalfs). The
VM already has SuSE 10.0 32 bits on the main VMWare drive sda and LFS
was installed on the next drive, hda. Would hda then be the second
drive in grub and if so, would it follow the same naming convention
eg. sda = hd0
Hi,
I've made a VmWare machine with SuSE 10.0 using the default SCSI type
of drives. Thus I created a main / sda drive, a smaller sdb swap
drive, and an extra sdc drive. After installaing SuSE, I then added a
IDE (hda)to install LFS using nALFS from the LiveCD. The install is
completed (just h
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:14:29 +0200
Winter Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, good book. I have followed the book and everything worked. But
> now I want to end up whith a system without any development tools. Of
> course I can try to manually remove gcc, etc after the build.
> And remember
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:47:40 -0500
kaladen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lanas wrote:
> > I get the following rather strange error when compiling glibc (LFS
> > 5.1.1) in Chap 05.
> > ../sysdeps/unix/clock_nanosleep.c:59: undefined reference to
> > `__libc
Hi all,
I get the following rather strange error when compiling glibc (LFS
5.1.1) in Chap 05. I've triple-checked the compile instructions and
verified if the environment (i.e. bashrc and .bash_profile of user) was
properly loaded. So far, I have squarely no clue about what is the
problem exac
27 matches
Mail list logo
