Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow wrote:
>>
>> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
>>
> Richard,
>
> Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus? For example, I need to
> use okular (althou
Armin K. wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote:
>> 2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow :
>>> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
>>> avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
>>>
>>
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
Richard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.li
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 21/04/2014 17:50, TheOldFellow a écrit :
>> Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20140418
>>
>> Everything fine, including installation of xz, but kmod-17 clearly isn't
>> happy with the layout of the libs for xz.
>>
>> ro
Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20140418
Everything fine, including installation of xz, but kmod-17 clearly isn't happy
with the layout of the libs for xz.
root:/sources/kmod-17# make
make --no-print-directory all-recursive
Making all in .
CC libkmod/libkmod.lo
CC libkmod/libkmo
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:30:26 -0500
"Jordan Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:59 PM, TheOldFellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > I've got a weird problem, I can't get to www.adobe.com, everywhere
> > else is fi
I've got a weird problem, I can't get to www.adobe.com, everywhere
else is fine. My dns server correctly reports that the IP is
192.150.18.101, and I can ping it:
ping www.adobe.com
PING www.wip3.adobe.com (192.150.18.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.150.18.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 tim
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
David Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to Dan and Larry for the responses. Actually, something in Larry's
> message jogged something in my mind. I went back and explored the
> kernel.org pcmcia section a little more thoroughly and realized it was
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:38:01 -0700
"J. Greenlees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on a major positive note, the lfs livecd is the only current distro to
> actually run correctly on this ancient beast. knoppix and gnoppix both
> won't even boot, slak, debian will boot but won't install.
> suse locks u
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:36:14 -0400
Baho Utot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does LFS support SATA out of the box?
I'm curious about the term 'out the box' when applied to LFS. Isn't
the whole point that there isn't a box? Or if there is, YOU put it in
there?
A more interesting question is: " Doe
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 15:54:33 +0200
"Tijnema !" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm testing if it works now, I already put the cable down into my
> toilet and waiting for google to connect me :) I hope they work on
> sunday too :)
I'll bet the service is crap.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mai
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:21:07 + (WET)
Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, TheOldFellow wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:55:42 + (WET)
> >
> >>>
> >>> If you logout of your last shell does it go faster? There s
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:55:42 + (WET)
Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, TheOldFellow wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:01:06 + (WET)
> > Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using runit
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:01:06 + (WET)
Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using runit as alternative to sysvinit. Booting is no problem.
> Rebooting is terribly slow. After issuing "init 6", a normal-looking
> message appears, concerning services to stop. Then nothing for a long
> ti
Alan Lord wrote:
> Tijnema ! wrote:
>> So if you start creating a bash file that works for most of the
>> packages, with su/suo, you can copy that in every package to be
>> automated, and edit it for specific apps that require other configure
>> options.
>
> This is a BAD idea. This was simila
Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, TheOldFellow wrote:
>
>> Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>> I'm trying to understand how to use runit as substitute for sysvinit.
>> What I now do is to build LFS or CLFS according to the book, but omiting
>> sysvinit and s
Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I'm trying to understand how to use runit as substitute for sysvinit.
> The file hints/ATTACHMENTS/build-with-runit/build-with-runit-scripts.txt
> dates from 2004. Can anybody elaborate on this? (I mean, is it
> deprecated or just lacking a maintainer?) The hint says the auth
Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> Wasn't sure if this is an LFS or BLFS question since it deals with an
> upgrade of an established system rather than a question from the book...
> but anyhow, here's the deal:
>
> I have been running LFS for about 4 years now with a fresh rebuild
> whenever I get new hard
Eric Stout wrote:
> You can do whatever you want with boot scripts.
You make some excellent points here, it's good reading for Newbies.
Bootscripts are fun.
> Personally, I delete all that muckery that makes an aesthetically pleasing
> boot system, because I find that kind of scripting ot have mo
Bauke Jan Douma wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote on 06-02-07 09:41:
>> LFS is whatever YOU make it. The Linux Kernel is just part of LFS.
>>
>> Don't get mad at me, I wan't trying to get at you :-) You just seemed
>> to be saying that these things happened "&
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 2/6/07, Bauke Jan Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Btw., here's another reference to rc.local:
>> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/ref-guide/s1-boot-init-shutdown-booting.html
>>
>> Redhat..., hm. So again, praytell, what /is/ Linux.
>
> Well, t
Bauke Jan Douma wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote on 06-02-07 08:30:
>> Bauke Jan Douma wrote:
>>> Dan Nicholson wrote on 06-02-07 03:18:
>
>>> I always thought rc.local, if and when present, was indeed
>>> supposed to be run /last/ in the boot process --
Bauke Jan Douma wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote on 06-02-07 03:18:
>
>> I don't know if that's really a standard. In the SuSE partition I
>> have, it's called boot.local. And it's run just about last from their
>> "boot" script, the equivalent to our /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc. But, I think
>> for maximum c
Alberto Hernando wrote:
> El Viernes, 22 de Diciembre de 2006 12:43, KJ Tsanaktsidis escribió:
>> Well, i dunno about the ignoring of .mozconfig, but i do know how to
>> localize Firefox...
>> Just download an extension called a "language pack" and it should display
>> the UI in that language. Eg-
Andrew Benton wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
>
>> I'm having some problems with grub (and others) on my old i586. It's a
>> Fujitsu ErgoPro with a Pentium MMX 200Mhz.
>>
>> Has anyone any ideas?
>>
>
> Well the first thought that sprang to mind
I'm having some problems with grub (and others) on my old i586. It's a
Fujitsu ErgoPro with a Pentium MMX 200Mhz.
Grub installs happilly on the disk, an NEC DSE2100A, CHS=4092/16/63, but
grub hangs when booted from it after printing 'GRUB '. The problem is
that bios thinks this drive is CHS=1023
Jim Gifford wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
>
>> Jim Gifford wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't agree with Jim on this one. I build bootable systems with
>> several LFS packages missing. For instance, you don't need Sysvinit or
>> Syslog just to bo
Jim Gifford wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm a first time LFS user, and I'm working my way through the 6.0
>> revision of the book. I have purchased the paper book which I am reading
>> for background, and I am using the online book for building my system
>> (easier to copy
I've just built a new LFS using the Cross-LFS method. Most things
seem to be very stable, but I've got two inexplicable problems. I'll
start seperate threads on them though.
Man reads /etc/man.conf, but ignores it.
'man man', for instance, results in 'No manual entry for man', but
'man -M /usr
Phillip Fynan wrote:
> I know in the system requirements it lists a 2.6 kernel for udev to
> work, but I was wondering if I could build most of the packages on my
> 2.4 kernel and upgrade for the final steps?
>
> It would save a lot of effort before I get started, but will it work?
>
> Also, whic
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
>
>> Is there any standard way of doing
>> such things, some sort of "sandbox" technique that I may not be aware
>> of? Any advice greatly appreciated...
>
>
> I've generally had good results with '--prefix=/opt/gcc-4.0.0-20050410'.
> BTW: You'l
Jean Arnaud wrote:
> Joel Miller wrote:
>
>> Jean Arnaud wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I got an old P133 with only one gigabyte hard disk.
>>> Since i'm new to LFS, i'd like to know if it is possible to do a LFS
>>> installation on it ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>> The answer is yes and no. My fi
TheOldFellow wrote:
> Try gnumeric, it looks like it's a gnome app, but it isn't.
Actually, now I look at gnumeric again, it IS a gnome app. Last time I
looked, I'm sure it didn't need all those gnome-bloat packages.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
Jeremy Utley wrote:
> Donal Farrell wrote:
>
>> Hi there. Is it possible to build BLFS from my host system (SuSE) until
>> I have a GUI-based LFS-system to view the BLFS manual, etc?
After the reboot, I throw in the Nvidia
> drivers, install Opera to /opt, configure X, and start up X using twm.
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Donal Farrell wrote:
>
>> Hi there. Is it possible to build BLFS from my host system (SuSE) until
>> I have a GUI-based LFS-system to view the BLFS manual, etc?
>>
> Do you mean "is it possible to do BLFS in chroot"? I think the answer is
> yes, provided you're running the s
Andrew Benton wrote:
Where can I get the man pages for tar? It doesn't seem to install any
Try the LFS Package Reference on my website (or the hint if you like
typing urls out by hand).
Although tar has no man page that I know of, there is an excellent manual.
Richard.
http://homepage.ntlworld.co
MIke Cruz wrote:
then I have been removing any packages along with the source files -
like the books said. It didn't mention not to remove gcc source or the
build dir nor did it say i need the two other gcc packages "core and g++"
I downloaded and completed the sec ond pass
OK I think I might s
Joel Miller wrote:
Mukesh Kaushal wrote:
1) First of all you should not delete sources n build dirs of packages
which u r goin' to use again later.
First, please don't top post. See the FAQ on nettiquette if you have
more questions. Second, you should always be removing the source and
build dir
MIke Cruz wrote:
So sounds like i will repartion my harddrive give LFS some room then
take my time install LFS learn alot
and in the end have a really really nice system. Thanks again
Mike,
Good luck with it. I hope you have as much enjoyment from LFS as I have.
Finally, a blatant advert for some
MIke Cruz wrote:
Hello
I have a question before I take the leap to install a LFS system.
First I have a HP Pavilion zv5034us Laptop
2.66 P4 with 1GB of RAM
Ati IGP integrated video 128MB shared mem
Ati IPX150 AC'97 integrat
40 matches
Mail list logo
