Scott Castaline wrote:
> Running LFS-6.3/BLFS-6.3 on virtualbox and decided to move the original
> system to a larger virtual disk.
>
> Original disk 8GB 3 partitions 1 = /boot, 2 = swap, 3 = /
> New disk 20GB 3 partitions; same as above just different sizes.
>
> Created th
Scott Castaline wrote:
> Adam Roach wrote:
>> Scott Castaline wrote:
>>> Completed the build using Virtualbox virtual machine. On the first boot
>>> I get the following:
>>>
>>> Booting 'LFS 6.3
>>>
>>> root (hd0,0)
&
Adam Roach wrote:
> Scott Castaline wrote:
>> Completed the build using Virtualbox virtual machine. On the first boot
>> I get the following:
>>
>> Booting 'LFS 6.3
>>
>> root (hd0,0)
>> Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
Completed the build using Virtualbox virtual machine. On the first boot
I get the following:
Booting 'LFS 6.3
root (hd0,0)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
kernel /boot/lfskernel-2.6.22.5 root=/dev/hda3
Error 15: File not found
Press any key to continue...
menu.lst is
Satish Patel wrote:
> Regards,
>
> Satish Patel
>
>
> Quoting Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> When I do ./configure --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix="", it'll terminate
>> with the error;
>>
>> configure: error: Cann
When I do ./configure --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix="", it'll terminate
with the error;
configure: error: Cannot find tinfo, ncurses or termcap libraries
I am sure that I installed ncurses as all of the libncurses* files exist
in /usr/lib/. I'm not sure about termcap or tinfo as I haven't been ab
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just realized that I did the 2nd pass of binutils-2.17 build from within
>> the source directory instead of the build directory. Is this going to be
>> a problem with t
Just realized that I did the 2nd pass of binutils-2.17 build from within
the source directory instead of the build directory. Is this going to be
a problem with the rest of the build? If it is, can I undo it and how,
or do I need to start from scratch again?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailm
to watch
> out for funky messages during boot though..
>
> My question was about caveats and experiences from installing LFS from
> inside a virtual machine.
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have seen in
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Scott Castaline wrote these words on 08/11/08 16:27 CST:
>
>> I've been working under the assumption that prior to unpacking a
>> packages tarball that you create a directory using the package name
>> -build ie: glibc-build. Then change to
I've been working under the assumption that prior to unpacking a
packages tarball that you create a directory using the package name
-build ie: glibc-build. Then change to the build directory to unpack the
tarball, further moving to the first level directory created by the
action of unpacking t
Andy wrote:
> I am using the lfs 6.3 book with the lfs liveCD as my installation
> medium and when trying to compile it exits with the error given below
>
> //ERROR
> gcc -B/tools/bin/ ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/signal.c -c -std=gnu99 -O2
> -Wall -Winline -Wwrite-strings -
ware" configuration, so I think one has to watch out for funky
> messages during boot though..
>
> My question was about caveats and experiences from installing LFS from
> inside a virtual machine.
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have seen in the archives mention of installing VirtualBox on a system
created by LFS. I am wondering if anyone has used VirtualBox to run the
LiveCD to create a Linux system on a VM. If there are anyone that's done
this, are there any gotchas that I should be looking out for?
--
http://linux
Is it possible to build LFS on a VM particularly VirtualBox-1.6.2 using
the LiveCD as the Host under VBox? Any recommended initial settings for
the Host/Guest configurations? Also the Guest Additions for Linux would
not be useful until well into BLFS?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Be sure not to use BitTorrent also. It might flood your bathroom.;)
>
> On 4/1/07, Victor Tanvuia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Maybe your toilet is not in the coverage area. Try moving it around to get a
>> better signal. :D
>>
>>
Colin Dean wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 15:54:33 +0200
>> "Tijnema !" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm testing if it works now, I already put the cable down into my
>>> toilet and waiting for google to connect me :) I hope they work on
>>> sunday too :)
>>
>> I'll bet the
Bauke Jan Douma wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote on 10-02-07 23:04:
>
>> Colin Dean wrote these words on 02/10/07 15:53 CST:
>>
>>
>>> Ideas/help/anything welcome.
>>>
>> In times like those, I usually rely on my friends Jim Beam, Johnny
>> Walker and Jack Daniels. Oh yeah, I sometimes
doing this in a dual boot situation, it's not too convenient to reboot
to the other distribution to check on something else and then boot back
to my lfs part.
--
Scott Castaline aka Bad2theBone
Hey! I was born crazy, what's your excuse?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listin
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 20:19 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Now the only
> > problem that I'm aware of is my delete key doesn't work, although I
> > think I may have fixed it just haven't
Is there a book yet for BLFS that follows LFS-6.2 yet? Or can I follow
BLFS 6.1?
--
Scott Castaline aka Bad2theBone
Hey! I was born crazy, what's your excuse?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: Se
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 19:53 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > all packages built and installed between 1st adjust and gcc 2nd pass are
> > ok they reflect the correct /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2, only gcc is wrong.
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 18:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It seems that gcc is the only one pointing to lib instead of tools/lib
> > all the others point to tools/lib on the readelf -l command and it looks
&g
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:54 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure but I think I found it in
> > $LFS/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3
> >
> > On viewing it I found this:
> >
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:24 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > >
> > > $ readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter
> > >
> > > If
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:24 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > >
> > > $ readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter
> > >
> > > If
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > configure:2634: gcc --version &5
> > ../glibc-2.3.6/configure: line 2635: /tools/bin/gcc: No such file or
> > directory
> > configure:
/* end confdefs.h. */
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I can locate or fin gcc just
fine, and as far as I know the permissions are set correctly: tools
owned by root:root 755
same with tools/bin and gcc
TIA
--
Scott Castaline aka Bad2theBone
Hey! I was born crazy, what
28 matches
Mail list logo
