Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 4/17/06, Richard A Downing FBCS CITP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> However, I've been experimenting with FUSE (Filesystem in User Space),
>> which has a driver in the kernel. The entry in fstab has a zero in the
>> 6th field(fs-passno)
During boot the checkfs bootscript runs the command:
fsck ${options} -a -A -C -T 2>/dev/null
and according to my reading of man fsck this means that fsck is to check
each filesystem in /etc/fstab in the order specified by the 6th field.
In my fstab I have a number of filesystem with zero as the
Archaic wrote:
> As fellow Hoosiers probably know, our fine government has again decided
> to change timezone laws. With a glorious history of changes being made
> not just at the state level, but on a county-by-county level, and with
> the addition of several changes that were implemented, reverte
Fabien LUCE wrote:
>
>>
>> Bison, Flex and gcc should be enough on Ubuntu
>
>
> Are you sure??
> Can someone confirm?
>
> Thanks a lot
If you need your hand held this much, stick to Ubuntu. You are not
ready for LFS yet.
You could also try it and find out for yourself of course, rather than
The current svn instructions fail for me as follows:
if gcc -Dunix -DSLRN_LIB_DIR=\"/usr/lib/slrn\"
-DSHAREDIR=\"/usr/share/slrn\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -I. -I. -I. -I.
-I../intl-g -O2 -MT art.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/art.Tpo" -c -o
art.o art.c; \
then mv -f ".deps/art.Tpo" ".deps/art.Po"; els
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/3/06, Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>>> Richard A Downing wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone know how to set up such a system for gphoto2 (not
>>>> usb-storage)?
>>
Whilst it's very nice for new friends to LFS to help out the later
arrivals, PLEASE NOTE that we don't Top Post, and we Trim the stuff
copied into the reply to the bit that is relevant.
Please see the FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/#netiquette
Thanks,
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.o
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm actually in the middle of the first LFS book, somwhere at the beginning
> of
> chapter 6. I appreciate the quality of the doc: everything is well explained,
> and I just have to follow the book.
>
> Just out of curiousity...
>
> 1) LFS/BLFS... is it just a "le
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:35:07 GMT
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't believe I reposted the whole digest. Apologies to all.
>
We all do something like that occasionally. Even pan-dimensional
superbeings (like me).
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-su
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 07:13:33 -0600
boovarahan boovarahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi !
> I tried to install PPP-2.4.3 after installing the libpcap-0.9.3 file
> and I get the following error msg:
>
> ***
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:45:20 -0800
Justin O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Paul Rogers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
> > http://www.geocities.com/paulgrogers/
> > Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
> > (I do not personally endorse any additions afte
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:34:48 +0100
Clemens Haupt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clemens,
I realise that you are helping another German speaker. However this
list is English. If you give him bad advice we can't correct it if we
didn't understand it. Please stick to English on the lists and mail
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:24:42 +
Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:03:24 +0100
> > Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> It doesn't actually take that long as long a
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:03:24 +0100
Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm an Austrian writer living in Montpezat (South France), and a 100%
> GNU/Linux user since 2001.
Excellent, you are the 'Target Audience'. Welcome to LFS.
> One question, just on the curious side: how did y
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:23:14 +0100
Tor Olav Stava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you should ask yourself what you want from your system.
Good advice.
>
> I've been using SVN version for the last dozen builds, and there's
> been no major issues with it. Of course, I don't have any critical
>
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:55:47 +0100
Jeremy Monnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have searched the web site for an history of the lfs, but I couldn't
> find it, can you tell me if there is one ?
> My point is I built (b)lfs-6.1, and I would like to start another
> build, and I was wond
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:39:25 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
> > sudo - nice package, solves the problem of scripting su. It's not
> > in BLFS (but should be), however it's a straight CMMI package.
>
> Yes it is.
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:54:27 -0800
Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/20/05, Michiel Faber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I indeed tried su(do) but i didn't wan't the "asking for password"
> > stuff.
>
> I'm no sudo expert, but I think there's is a way to disable the
> password prom
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:26:59 +0100
Michiel Faber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson schreef:
>
> >On 12/20/05, Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:44:16 - (GMT)
> &
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:44:16 - (GMT)
"S. Anthony Sequeira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, December 20, 2005 11:48, Jeremy Byron said:
> > Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >> Yep, no reason why not. You can script everything if you want. In
> >> fact, I doubt there are any veteran LFSers who d
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:50:18 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>
> > Me too! I needs them too. I also need a spellchecker that knows
> > what I meant to say...
>
> Yeah, we all could use that. :) Hard to code though...
And then you'd need to decide if it wa
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:02:21 +0530 (IST)
"Chandan M. C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hai All ,
> I want to know what will be the actual size of LFS ..After building
> completely .. We are getting 270 MB... Can it be reduced still .
>
> Regards
> Chandan
Hints.
--
http://linuxfroms
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:45:27 +0100
"Tony Balinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Karl:
> > Hi, just to let you all know, I have (almost) seamlessly set up
> > what I had running in slackware, lfs style; the checklist:-
> ...
> > boot in 30 seconds - tick (nearly 2 minutes in slack)
> ...
>
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 01:16:13 +0100
Jean-Philippe Mengual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks yo said to me, I installed without problems pwlib_Mimas_patch2
> and openh323_Mimas_patch2, two files available on the link present in
> blfs book.
OK, this works for me:
Build pwlib_Mimas_patch2 an
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:37:38 +0530
Dhaval Motghare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree the LiveCD really sucks
Another damn HTML Top-poster too. Are we being invaded by Windolts?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Uns
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:15:38 -0600
Kevin Barnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could try a port knocker. http://www.portknocking.org/
>
> This is designed for exactly what you are trying to do.
>
> On 12/1/05, Matt Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin,
PLEASE STOP sending top-posts in HTML
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:51:09 -0500
"Andy Kalenderian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in HTML. So he should be ignored. He hasn't read either the FAQ or
the Essential Pre-Reading Hint.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:04:50 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>
> > Bing. You hit the nail on the head there. As Richard said, Fedora Core 4
> > isn't a suitable distro to build the stable version of the book. It
> > should work OK for the development vers
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:15:36 -0600
Kevin Barnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK I thought I'd try to run through the LFS install. I'm using a
> basic Fedora Code 4 host minimal install with a few extra RPMs so I
> can build.
This is a FAQ. FC4 isn't a suitable host distro.
Read FAQ. Search ar
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:09:27 + (GMT)
Ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a number of 486 machines. They have very little memory
> 16M or less. My interest is to make a version of Linux to
> run a few programs on these, particularly the mail program
> Mutt and Midnight Commander; n
Tom wrote:
> How do I correctly move the root partition to another partition? Im also
> want to move /usr /var as well and probably /home
>
>
I've not tried this, but I think it should work.
Boot using something like this grub line:
kernel (hd0,5)/boot/lfskernel-1.2.3 root=/dev/hda4 init=/bin/
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
> A question for the "package users" users out there. Anyone using
> postfix as their MTA?
This thread seems to have dissolved into 'recommend an MTA'. I'd
recommend XMail. It's easy to build, easy to configure, has a built in
pop3 server, integrates well with clamav
Ian Brown wrote:
> Hello LFS List,
>
> Can LFS stabel (6.1) be build with FC4 ?
No. The FC4 Gcc is heavily patched and doesn't work.
Search the archives of LFS-Dev and LFS-Support for possible ways round this.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.lin
Lennon Cook wrote:
> I'm about to be re-doing LFS (using the GCC4 book, while I built my
> current system using the 6.1-pre1 book), and I'm wondering: if /boot
> is on a separate partition, do I need to reinstall Grub as part of
> LFS, or will my current one still do the job? That is to say: are
>
Mark wrote:
>>>Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>... Cross-lfs is probably untested for
>>>pentium-class processors ( < i686), and had certain issues with glibc
>>>last week which make me reluctant to recommend it for this specific
>>>situation (because restarting from the beginning will be painfully
>>>slow)
Christopher Reimer wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> I'm unclear what you mean by 40MB/20GB and 'Ontrack' - that sounds
>> like a windoze driver ? I imagine it will take several days to build
>> LFS on a P100, so I wouldn't look forward to it, but it should
>> certainly be possible.
>
>
> The la
Allen J. Newton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried to build LFS 6.1 three times with no success. All three attempts
> have failed at the same point, so I'm wondering what I'm missing?
> Any other ideas of things I might try to get it to work?
>
It's most likely that this is a kernel config probl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Thank you for responding. I should have mentioned in my original post
> that I read about alsamixer in the archives and have attempted it. I
> received the following error:
>
> alsamixer: function snd_ctl_open failed for default: No such device
>
> I'm uncertain
David Jensen wrote:
> David Rosal wrote:
>
>> Hi again.
>>
>> Continuing to reduce the size of my LFS, I've found a quite strange
>> thing: it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with different
>> names instead of simply symlink them. For example:
>
>
> I was sent to newbie corner last
39 matches
Mail list logo
