Angel Tsankov wrote:
> May I remove the $LFS/tools directory after building the LFS system?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/revisedchroot.html
Jeremy.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscri
Guilherme Moro wrote:
Hello,
i can't understand how to know the installation options for each package...
Package install options are generally accessible by './configure --help'
for example .. in the ncurses installation page ( chapter 6.21 ) he
told me to do
chmod -v 755 /usr/lib/*.5.4
T
Miles Fidelman wrote:
As far as I can tell, I have /boot/grub/menu.1st set up right:
mv /boot/grub/menu.1st /boot/grub/menu.lst
It's a lower case 'L' not a one.
Regards,
Jeremy.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsu
Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
>
First, use of the flag in CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS and EVEN LDFLAGS don't seem to
be dangerous at all.
Looks like it's being done intelligently for executable and shared files.
"...with ELF you typically need some symbolic information in the file
for the program to load and
v p wrote:
> I'm going to install LFS and therefore have a question: can I define
> CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS to contain '-s' flag and compile
> EVERYTHING with it, even GCC and GLIBC? Book says nobody must use
You can do anything you like including breaking your build by deviating
ignorantly f
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Yep, no reason why not. You can script everything if you want. In
fact, I doubt there are any veteran LFSers who don't script the build.
I've built LFS dozens of times since I heard of it at v3-ish so I guess
I qualify as a veteran LFSer. I started writing scripts to do
thorsten wrote:
Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists ... yes
Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists ... yes
Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs-stage1-5" exists ... no"
As far as I know, this stage1-5 is not needed.
Yes it is. The book tells you to copy the necessary stage1-5 files just
below t
Lennon Cook wrote:
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Not true. It is a *myth* that has propogated thru these lists so many
times that it *sounds* true. If it were true, gentoo users would need
to reinstall their OS every time a toolchain package was updated.
Gentoo users are generally told that they sh
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
For your current problem, one thing you could do is to use the
following to install the new gcc:
make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/gcc install
This will install everything into a fakeroot /var/tmp/gcc. Now remove
the previous gcc version from the standard directories and then
recur
Doug Ronne wrote:
Lets say you wanted to re-compile and install your copy of gcc and you
didn't want some of the files lying around, maybe you didn't want some
ada compiler anymore or something, and you wanted to make sure that
you didn't have leftovers from the previous copy. How would you do
t
Tom wrote:
I cant read that page its small ???
1) Move your mouse pointer into the middle of the focused browser window
2) Hold CTRL
3) Spin your mouse wheel (or tap + if you haven't one)
Regards,
Jeremy.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromsc
David Ciecierski wrote:
After the bootstrap and dmake, I get stuck on libxmlsec. The
configure runs, and bails because it can't find the nss/nspr stuff (or
openssl/gnutls). It's not accepting the original configure command
apparently, and even running it separately I can't get it to accept
t
mlij wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin# firefox
*** nsExtensionManager::_disableObsoleteExtensions - failure, catching
exception so finalize window can close
/usr/lib/firefox-1.0.6/run-mozilla.sh: line 159: 25954 Segment Fault
"$prog" ${1+"$@"}
What happened?
Your font setup is likely
13 matches
Mail list logo
