For the benefit of anyone who may come across this thread after
experiencing similar errors:
Despite the disappointing check summary, I pressed on with the build and
was able to complete it successfully without further problems. Subsequent
packages tested well, and the resulting system booted with
d.
Should the patch be applied at all, and if so, where would that happen if
not in 6.39?
Thanks.
Bob Elgie
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>How much disk space do you have on your LFS partition? What
> kind of hardware are you building on? Is this in a virtual environment?
>
>-- Bruce
>
Not virtual.
Intel i7 950
6 Gb RAM
Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 motherboard
Linux debianmint
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Unix User wrote:
> Bob Elgie schrieb am 10:22 Dienstag, 17.Dezember
> 2013:
>
> I'm unhappy with the check summary for this package. After similar results
> on my first attempt, I executed
> >rm -Rf gcc-4.8.1/ gcc-build
> >and st
Up to this point in LFS 7.4, I haven't encountered unsolvable difficulties.
The checks thus far in Chapter 6 have been successful.
If these results are, in fact, not acceptable, how far back should I
retrace my steps?
I will be grateful for any advice.
Bob Elgie
Context follows:
host ver
