On 06/26/2012 10:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The /boot partition is rarely written. The purpose of a journaled file
> system is to recover written data in a cache that is in the journal an
> not properly committed to the disk in the case of a power/system
> failure. Making /boot ext3 is OK, but
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> ext3 should be ok for /boot. fsck will be run on *all* the
> filesystems in fstab which are automounted and in need of an fsck.
>
Understood. Thanks.
>
> Thanks, I didn't know that file could do that!
>
No worries. I didn't know that file
ode=0755,nosuid 0 0
# End /etc/fstab
Thanks.
Alexander Kapshuk.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> What this mean? I have four partitions:
>
> Partition Mount Point Description
> sda1 / Initial OS, CentOS.
> sda2 swap Swap for the initial OS.
> sda3 swap Swap for LFS
> sda4
On 03/29/2012 07:58 PM, xinglp wrote:
> 在 2012年3月29日 下午11:58，Alexander Kapshuk 写道：
>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglp wrote:
>>
>>> 在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk 写道：
>>>
>>>> What
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglp wrote:
> 在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk 写道：
> > What patch would that be?
> > The book doesn't mention any.
>
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/binutils-pass2.html
> =
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglp wrote:
> 在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk 写道：
> > What patch would that be?
> > The book doesn't mention any.
>
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/binutils-pass2.html
> =
What patch would that be?
The book doesn't mention any.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:35 PM, xinglp wrote:
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
--
http://linuxfromscratc
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:01 PM, ankit vishwakarma <
ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> please provide me help on the following error i started all the
> process from the beginning still the error persists.
>
>
>
> In file included from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syslog.c:10:0:
> ../misc/sys
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Sumeet Shekhar wrote:
> I am not getting any output while running the program dummy.c after
> GCC pass2 installation.
>
> Also it says that create gcc-build directory again. Should i remove
> the previous gcc-build and build it again or create another build
> direc
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 21:54 +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > (6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp
> > /lib; And this is where I found it confusing, ../usr/bin/cpp ==
> > $LFS/sources/
Got it. Thanks.
It's relative to /lib, not $LFS/sources/gcc-build as I had thought
initially.
I'll have another look at ln(1).
On 03/21/2012 10:25 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:54:18PM +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
>> (6). While still in $LF
isting file whether using an absolute or a relative path;
I hope I'm making sense here.
Anyway, thanks a lot to all those who responded to my query. I reckon
it'll make more sense as I progress through the book.
Alexander Kapshuk.
On 03/21/2012 10:07 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Tue
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Rick Shelton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
> wrote:
> > While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
> > '/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests cr
While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
'/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests creating this
symlink, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib'. I assumed that I was supposed to run
the command line while still in '/sources/gcc-build'. If that is the case,
shouldn
15 matches
Mail list logo
