Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

2014-03-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:07:49 -0400 >> baho utot wrote: > >> I think there are not many folks that have that on a separate >> partition. >> >> That's really the only problem with using /var/run. > > Although I did toy with the idea of changing my system to have /var on >

Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

2014-03-23 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
>On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:07:49 -0400 >baho utot wrote: > I think there are not many folks that have that on a separate > partition. > > That's really the only problem with using /var/run. Although I did toy with the idea of changing my system to have /var on a separate partition. It's just that

Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

2014-03-23 Thread baho utot
On 03/23/2014 11:58 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > baho utot wrote: > >> Just trying to match what I have on my unix boxes. Even if it hasn't >> been updated doesn't mean it's not relavent. >> I understand adding /sys but /run makes no sense as it could have been >> /var/run which by the way IS in the

Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

2014-03-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
baho utot wrote: > Just trying to match what I have on my unix boxes. Even if it hasn't > been updated doesn't mean it's not relavent. > I understand adding /sys but /run makes no sense as it could have been > /var/run which by the way IS in the standard. /var doesn't work if it is mounted parti

Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

2014-03-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Simon Geard wrote: > On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote: >> I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager. >> >> I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux >> systems file system layout matches/closely matches my FreeBSD systems.

Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

2014-03-23 Thread baho utot
On 03/23/2014 07:32 AM, Robin wrote: > On 23 March 2014 11:22, baho utot wrote: >> On 03/23/2014 04:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote: >>> On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote: I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager. I would like to adhere to Fil

Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

2014-03-23 Thread Robin
On 23 March 2014 11:22, baho utot wrote: > > On 03/23/2014 04:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote: >> On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote: >>> I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager. >>> >>> I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux

Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

2014-03-23 Thread baho utot
On 03/23/2014 04:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote: > On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote: >> I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager. >> >> I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux >> systems file system layout matches/closely mat

Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

2014-03-23 Thread Simon Geard
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote: > I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager. > > I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux > systems file system layout matches/closely matches my FreeBSD systems. > When was the /run d