I am pleased to announce a release candidate for the first release of
the Linux From Scratch book that is using systemd as the main init system.
The book contains all the changes from LFS-7.5-rc1, along with extra
packages that are necessarry for systemd, as well with some packages
removed that ar
Alexey Orishko wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Personally I'd recommend:
>>
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.5-rc1/
>
> Any approximate date for a final release?
The target is March 1st.
> There are a few issues with a new release for me at this poin
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Personally I'd recommend:
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.5-rc1/
Any approximate date for a final release?
There are a few issues with a new release for me at this point:
- I need a kernel which has a long term support (3.10.x
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 7.5-rc1. This is the first release candidate on the road to
LFS-7.5. It is a major release with toolchain updates to binutils,
glibc, and gcc. In total, 32 packages were updated from LFS-7.4 and
changes to text h
Alexey Orishko wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have an old LFS 6.3 system I'm going to upgrade.
> I've noticed that LFS-7.4 and CLFS 2.1.0 have two different udev variants.
>
> A few questions related to that:
> - Will CLFS and LFS go different ways in package selection? (udev in
> particular)
> - Which o
Hi guys,
I have an old LFS 6.3 system I'm going to upgrade.
I've noticed that LFS-7.4 and CLFS 2.1.0 have two different udev variants.
A few questions related to that:
- Will CLFS and LFS go different ways in package selection? (udev in particular)
- Which one udev variant CLFS Eudev-1.3 or LFS U
Em 16-02-2014 13:48, Golam Md. Shibly escreveu:
> ../gcc-4.8.1/libstdc++-v3/configure \
> --host=$BDUX_TGT \
> --prefix=/tools \
> --disable-multilib \
> --disable-shared \
> --disable-nls
Frans de Boer wrote:
> Hm, the reason I posted it in the first place was just because I noticed
> that Bruce his name was attached to systemd - somewhere. I can't find it
> any more but still my question stands.
That's just a svn version where the editor has not been updated yet.
-- Bruce
--
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
> From: Frans de Boer
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of sys
../gcc-4.8.1/libstdc++-v3/configure \
--host=$BDUX_TGT \
--prefix=/tools \
--disable-multilib \
--disable-shared \
--disable-nls \
--disable-libstdcxx-threads \
>On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
>Frans de Boer wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
> knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS stick to sysvinit
> while
On 02/16/2014 02:38 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 01:04:12AM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I have been spending my time on LFS IRC for a long time now and have
>> noticed that most users who come for help there get stuck at configuring
>> their kernel.
>>
>> Thus, I
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:41:16 +0100
> From: Frans de Boer
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>
> On 02/16/2014 02:55 PM, akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
> >> From: Frans de Boer
> >> To: lfs-support@linuxfroms
make
--print-file-name=crtend.o` /mnt/bdux/sources/glibc-build/csu/crtn.o
/mnt/bdux/sources/glibc-build/timezone/scheck.o: file not recognized: File
truncated
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [/mnt/bdux/sources/glibc-build/timezone/zic] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/
On 02/16/2014 02:55 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
>> From: Frans de Boer
>> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
>> Subject: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
>> sysvinit.
On 02/16/2014 01:52 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 16.2.2014 12:59, Frans de Boer wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
>> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
>> knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS st
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
> From: Frans de Boer
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of sys
On 16.2.2014 12:59, Frans de Boer wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
> knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS stick to sysvinit
> while the rest of the world i
Dear All,
It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS stick to sysvinit
while the rest of the world is moving to systemd?
Of course, simplicity might
19 matches
Mail list logo
