On 01/16/14 18:07, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
> On 01/16/2014 04:23 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> Le 16/01/2014 22:15, William Darryl Jackson a écrit :
> You are correct - Pierre, I came to that same conclusion. So I very
> carefully repeated the steps on page 36 to ensure those folders were
> b
On Jan 16, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Louis Rine wrote:
> Ah, I was wondering if dash would make a difference. I will fix that
> and try again. Thank you. :)
It does, and that is why the host system requirements states:
Bash-3.2 (/bin/sh should be a symbolic or hard link to bash)
But that may not be
Ah, I was wondering if dash would make a difference. I will fix that and
try again. Thank you. :)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 05:47:42PM -0600, Louis Rine wrote:
> > If this is the correct use of ldd...
> >
> > :~$ ldd /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 05:47:42PM -0600, Louis Rine wrote:
> If this is the correct use of ldd...
>
> :~$ ldd /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-ranlib
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffa837b000)
> libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7ff874f03000)
> libc.so.6 =
If this is the correct use of ldd...
:~$ ldd /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-ranlib
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffa837b000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7ff874f03000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7ff874b3a000)
/lib64/ld
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:23:51PM -0600, Louis Rine wrote:
> Hello all. :)
>
> I'v gone through the book a couple times in the past on i686, but this is
> my first time around with x86_64. All seemed to go well until I ran into
> this little gem while installing libstdc++:
>
> <...lots of compil
On 01/16/2014 04:23 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 16/01/2014 22:15, William Darryl Jackson a écrit :
>> Greetings,
>>
>> My first pass of make produced the following error:
>>
>> checking for MPFR... no
>> configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static
>> vs shared)
Hello all. :)
I'v gone through the book a couple times in the past on i686, but this is
my first time around with x86_64. All seemed to go well until I ran into
this little gem while installing libstdc++:
<...lots of compilation output...>
Making install in libsupc++
make[1]: Entering directory `
Davis Abubakr-Sadik Nii Nai gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hello list,
> I am trying to build LFS 7.4 stable. The package check-0.9.10 in
> section 5.14 failed to build.
> I got it to build, but would like to ask if anyone has come across
> this problem, and since it's not documen
Le 16/01/2014 22:15, William Darryl Jackson a écrit :
> Greetings,
>
> My first pass of make produced the following error:
>
> checking for MPFR... no
> configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including static
> vs shared).
> make[1]: *** [configure-mpc] Error 1
> make[1]: Le
Greetings,
My first pass of make produced the following error:
checking for MPFR... no
configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including
static vs shared).
make[1]: *** [configure-mpc] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
make: *** [all] Error 2
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:04 PM, William Harrington wrote:
> The New short option -J (alias for --lzma) was put in 1.20.90 which is
> in 1.22.
This didn't make it,
Also for the release note: http://freecode.com/projects/tar/releases/295528
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch
On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:00 PM, parmenides wrote:
> (2) In chapter 5, "5.7. Glibc-2.18"
> I got the following warning:
>
> configure: WARNING:
> *** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions:
> autoconf
> *** some features will be disabled.
> *** Check the INSTALL file for req
On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:00 PM, parmenides wrote:
> (1) In Preface, "vii. Host System Requirements",
> the version of tar is required 1.18, but this version does not support
> xz format at all.As such, the following command will fail:
> tar Jxvf foo.tar.xz
> Although using xz first then tar w
On 01/16/14 13:00, parmenides wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am build the LFS 7.4 following the book, and find two suspected bugs:
>
> (2) In chapter 5, "5.7. Glibc-2.18"
> I got the following warning:
>
> configure: WARNING:
> *** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions: autoconf
> *** s
Hi,
I am build the LFS 7.4 following the book, and find two suspected bugs:
(1) In Preface, "vii. Host System Requirements",
the version of tar is required 1.18, but this version does not support
xz format at all.As such, the following command will fail:
tar Jxvf foo.tar.xz
Although using
On 01/16/2014 10:46 AM, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
Greetings, back in GCC-4.8.1 again section 5.5.1 - after re-reading
everything I decided to do as suggested to try to find out why I am
having so much difficulty with this 'make'.
In the config.log I found the following fatal errors:
Threa
Em 16-01-2014 13:37, Pierre Labastie escreveu:
> Le 16/01/2014 16:49, William Darryl Jackson a écrit :
>> On 01/16/2014 10:46 AM, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
>>> Greetings, back in GCC-4.8.1 again section 5.5.1 - after re-reading
>>> everything I decided to do as suggested to try to find out why
Le 16/01/2014 16:49, William Darryl Jackson a écrit :
> On 01/16/2014 10:46 AM, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
>> Greetings, back in GCC-4.8.1 again section 5.5.1 - after re-reading
>> everything I decided to do as suggested to try to find out why I am
>> having so much difficulty with this 'make'
On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:46 AM, William Darryl Jackson wrote:
> After the the configure appears to complete successfully. Should I
> be concerned about either of these two failures?
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
No, it is testing a system for which compiler is installed and which
options to include f
Greetings, back in GCC-4.8.1 again section 5.5.1 - after re-reading
everything I decided to do as suggested to try to find out why I am
having so much difficulty with this 'make'.
In the config.log I found the following fatal errors:
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5)
confi
On 16 January 2014 00:59, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 04:51:23PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:50:47PM -0500, alex lupu wrote:
> > > I would like to submit for your consideration the following changes
> > > to the Section "III. 6.7. Linux-3.12.6 API Heade
22 matches
Mail list logo
