On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 23:47 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 19:49 -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> > The following packages are the only ones I have found ( in Chapter 5 )
> > that either puts something into or requires /lib64
> >
> > binutils-pass-1
> > gcc-pass-1
> > libstdc++
> > bi
On 12/02/2013 12:10 PM, William Harrington wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
>>
>> I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
>>
>> I would like to build for x86_64 and have t
On 11/27/2013 11:14 AM, Rob Taylor wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> I was wondering how it was going with secure boot and LFS?
>
> I have reached the 6.48. GRUB-2.00 stage of my re-build of LFS 7.4
> using my new scripts and wrappers.
>
> For this stage, since I already have secure boot disabled and am
> booti
On Nov 29, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
>
> I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
>
> I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout
> that i686 has ie without the l
Pierre,
Thank you.
> Go ahead, autoconf is not needed,
Any thoughts on why configure found it not to work?
I am concerned that whatever kept autoconf from working would have other
effects - ones that matter.
You might
> want to type:
> > env
> before beginning to work, and check that LFS, LFS
Hazel Russman googlemail.com> writes:
>
> I am trying to build a 64-bit lfs-7.4 system using a host system based
> on Slackware-14. Currently I am having a problem with the first pass of
> building gcc. During the internal build of libmpc, a search is made for
> /usr/lib64/libgmp.la. It is
Le 02/12/2013 05:41, Ron Hartikka a écrit :
> Hi Group,
>
> I am just hoping for a confirmation that I'm doing ok here.
> I think I'm not supposed to need autoconf in chapter 5.
> But I'm being conservative (since I have failed to build LFS 5 times
> so far).
> Details below. Most important first.