Dan McGhee wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 10:55 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Dan McGhee wrote:
>> When all this is successful, I could write the procedure up and post
>> it. Then, if anyone wanted to, it could be put in the book somewhere.
>> I could also write a hint if that were more practical.
>> For now,
On 10/28/2013 10:55 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Dan McGhee wrote:
When all this is successful, I could write the procedure up and post
it. Then, if anyone wanted to, it could be put in the book somewhere.
I could also write a hint if that were more practical.
For now, just let us know your results.
On Nov 6, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Sandy Widianto wrote:
> I'm sure there will be always another top-posting from new members,
> so I think about top-posting should be mentioned on LFS web.
>
> [ Sandy Widianto ]
We have pointers to proper posting:
Go to the Mailing Lists link at http://www.linuxfro
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:50:07 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Igor Živković wrote:
> > On 2013-11-06 13:11, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >>
> >> I was going to moan about you top-posting, but I see you are using
> >> gmail so I guess you don't have any real choice if you are using its
> >> web interface -
Thank you for telling me how to avoid top posting in Gmail, Bruce.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 11/06/2013 06:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Igor Živković wrote:
>>
>> Sadly, Thunderbird now defaults to top-posting in replies too.
>
> You might want to try seamonkey.
Nah, I don't like all-in-one solutions.
> Edit
> Mail & Newsgroups Account Settings
> Composition & Addressing
>
My Chapter 6 glibc check gave four errors. Three of them
(getaddrinfo4, annexc and run-conformtest) are expected but
the fourth in globtest is not mentioned in the book. Here is the
immediate context:
/bin/sh globtest.sh /sources/glibc-build/
' /sources/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
--libra
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> stosss wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Ken Moffat
> wrote:
> >>
> >> just as we consider that
> >> updating the kernel headers when updating the kernel is wrong.
> >
> > Why is this considered wrong?
>
> The headers are used when b
stosss wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>> just as we consider that
>> updating the kernel headers when updating the kernel is wrong.
>
> Why is this considered wrong?
The headers are used when building glibc. Any program that uses them
need to use the same ones tha
Igor Živković wrote:
> On 2013-11-06 13:11, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>> I was going to moan about you top-posting, but I see you are using
>> gmail so I guess you don't have any real choice if you are using its
>> web interface - sucks, doesn't it.
>
> Sadly, Thunderbird now defaults to top-posting i
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I can't imagine why you would want to build such an old version -
> for me, stable 7.4 is verging on 'old' (I'm from the "LFS is near
> the bleeding edge" school)
Not really. We are leading edge, but it's not bleeding edge until you
start using git/svn/beta/development/uns
- Original Message -
> From: Ken Moffat
...
> To clarify: consider the situation where you suspect you have a
> kernel bug. Say you are now on 3.12.0 and had previously used
> 3.11.5. As a first step, boot 3.11.5 [ assuming you kept it around,
> of course ] to see if things are differe
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> just as we consider that
> updating the kernel headers when updating the kernel is wrong.
Why is this considered wrong?
--
Jack
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Un
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:47:42PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I have a very vague recollection that one or two packages (probably
> not in BLFS) used to pick up kernel details by looking at
> /usr/src/linux , if it existed, in the very distant past. ISTR they
> actually wanted to know the capabil
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:22:23PM +, Richard wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I am surprised and confused by the warnings and instructions in Section 8.3 -
> can someone please elaborate on the points below?
>
> I have previously rebuild the kernel several times on a variety of distros
> and alth
Hello again,
I am surprised and confused by the warnings and instructions in Section 8.3 -
can someone please elaborate on the points below?
I have previously rebuild the kernel several times on a variety of distros and
although instructions differ there has always been one unshakable thing in
Yes, the Gmail web interface is horrible. I fixed my problem (I was in the
end of installing GCC). I found that I incorrectly typed the CC symlink,
and it was using the CC symlink from /tools/bin, not /usr/bin.
Thank you all for the help
Douglas Reno
On Nov 6, 2013 6:16 AM, "Igor Živković"
wrote
On 2013-11-06 13:11, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> I was going to moan about you top-posting, but I see you are using
> gmail so I guess you don't have any real choice if you are using its
> web interface - sucks, doesn't it.
Sadly, Thunderbird now defaults to top-posting in replies too.
--
Igor Živko
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:30:58AM -0600, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
> I am building GCC 4.7.1 (book says to use 4.7.2). My book version is 7.3,
> so I am not using the latest version of the book. I have built several
> systems with 4.7.1 instead of 4.7.1.
>
You seem to be confused about *where* you
I am building GCC 4.7.1 (book says to use 4.7.2). My book version is 7.3,
so I am not using the latest version of the book. I have built several
systems with 4.7.1 instead of 4.7.1.
My output of "grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'" is:
SEARCH_DIR("/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
SE
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:48:22AM +, Bernard Hurley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Bison test suite (LFS 7.4 6.31 page 144) fails to stopping compile
> with this message:[1]
>
Sorry I had forgotten to install flex. I had done everything else
including the synlinks and the lex script! I didn't f
21 matches
Mail list logo
