Re: [lfs-support] util-linux-2.22.2 make install error

2013-08-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Srinivasan Friendster wrote: > I am installing util-linux-2.22.2 in LFS 7.3 > > make was fine. > > make install I am getting these errors: > > chgrp tty /usr/bin/wall > > chgrp: invalid group : 'tty' > > make[4]: install-exec-hook-wall} Error 1 > make[4] : leaving directory '/sources/util-linu

[lfs-support] util-linux-2.22.2 make install error

2013-08-05 Thread Srinivasan Friendster
I am installing util-linux-2.22.2 in LFS 7.3 make was fine. make install I am getting these errors: chgrp tty /usr/bin/wall chgrp: invalid group : 'tty' make[4]: install-exec-hook-wall} Error 1 make[4] : leaving directory '/sources/util-linux-2.22.2 make[4]: install-exec-am} Error 1

Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect

2013-08-05 Thread akhiezer
> From: "parmenides" > Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 02:40:05 +0800 > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect > > > >> > Do you have the parameter 'SU_WHEEL_ONLY' set in /etc/login.defs ? If > >> > so, to > >> > what value? > >> > >> Yes, but I think it does not matter, because I ca

Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect

2013-08-05 Thread parmenides
>> > Do you have the parameter 'SU_WHEEL_ONLY' set in /etc/login.defs ? If so, >> > to >> > what value? >> >> Yes, but I think it does not matter, because I can not switch from a normal >> user to another normal user yet. >> In fact, I wonder why 'su' can not do what it should do - just switch

Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect

2013-08-05 Thread akhiezer
> From: "parmenides" > Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 01:53:10 +0800 > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect > > - Original Message - > From: "akhiezer" > To: "LFS Support List" > Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 10:44 PM > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not t

Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect

2013-08-05 Thread parmenides
- Original Message - From: "akhiezer" To: "LFS Support List" Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 10:44 PM Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 'su' command does not take effect > > Ignore PAM just now (or indeed forever); 'su -' should work ok without it. OK! I agree. > Do you have the parameter

Re: [blfs-support] usb (?hotplug?) problem

2013-08-05 Thread akhiezer
> From: "lux-integ" > Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:35:15 +0100 > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] usb (?hotplug?) problem > . . > > I am beginning to wonder if devfs (especially the rewritten version in the > mid > noughties ) should not be dusted off and brought up to > date (Linus ar

Re: [lfs-support] Network boot script - LFS 7.3

2013-08-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs
loki wrote: > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 17:24 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> loki wrote: >>> Took me some month :) >>> >>> ifconfig.statroute.wan0 >>> ONBOOT=yes >>> IFACE=wan0 >>> SERVICE=ipv4-static-route >>> TYPE=host >>> IP=36.121.79.0 >>> STATIC_GATEWAY=wan0 >>> PREFIX=25 > Just saw that I don't

Re: [lfs-support] coreutils-8.21 Make Error in LFS Installation

2013-08-05 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:55:24PM +0800, Srinivasan Friendster wrote: > I did # make V=1 |& tee coreutils.log > > > this is my coreutils.log: > Please don't top post, if you can avoid it. I see your mailer is not displaying its identity, and sending multi-part, so perhaps you cannot. > rm -

Re: [lfs-support] coreutils-8.21 Make Error in LFS Installation

2013-08-05 Thread Srinivasan Friendster
I did # make V=1 |& tee coreutils.log this is my coreutils.log: make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/sources/coreutils-8.21' Making all in po make[2]: Entering directory `/sources/coreutils-8.21/po' make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/coreutils-8.21/po' Making all in . make[2]: E

Re: [lfs-support] Network boot script - LFS 7.3

2013-08-05 Thread loki
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 17:24 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > loki wrote: > > Took me some month :) > > > > ifconfig.statroute.wan0 > > ONBOOT=yes > > IFACE=wan0 > > SERVICE=ipv4-static-route > > TYPE=host > > IP=36.121.79.0 > > STATIC_GATEWAY=wan0 > > PREFIX=25 > Just saw that I don't need STATIC_GAT