My god William Harrington, thank you so much !!
I just build all ext2, ext3, ext4 into the kernel, rather than as a module,
then, it booted And during the booting, there is nothing Failed (in
red), but all Passed (in green) !!
Thank you so much !!!
However, I don't know if it's bet
On Jan 4, 2013, at 7:00 PM, JIA Pei wrote:
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.7.1-lfs-SVN-20130102 root=/dev/sdd1
rootfstype=ext4 root-delay=10 ro
rootfstype isn't needed as init will mount the rootfs with the
appropriate fs if built into the kernel.
root-delay is not a valid option: view Documentatio
matthew gruda wrote:
checking for MPFR... no
configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including
static vs shared).
make[1]: *** [configure-mpc] Error 1
>
> and still getting the error
OK, you are not unpacking the tarballs properly. It's not finding mpfr.
That's explained
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> matthew gruda wrote:
> > When I try to compile gcc from 5.5 I get this after running make:
> >
> > checking for complex.h... yes
> > checking for library containing creal... -lm
> > checking whether creal, cimag and I can be used... yes
> > che
matthew gruda wrote:
> When I try to compile gcc from 5.5 I get this after running make:
>
> checking for complex.h... yes
> checking for library containing creal... -lm
> checking whether creal, cimag and I can be used... yes
> checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
> checking for size_t..
Hi, Bruce:
Thank you for your reply. I've already tested what you suggested, the
current /boot/grub/grub.cfg is like:
*menuentry "MyLinux (SVN-20130102) (on /dev/sdd1)" --class gnu-linux
--class gnu --class os {*
* insmod part_msdos*
* insmod ext2*
* set root='(hd3,msdos1)'*
* search --no-flopp
When I try to compile gcc from 5.5 I get this after running make:
checking for complex.h... yes
checking for library containing creal... -lm
checking whether creal, cimag and I can be used... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking for gettimeofday...
George Moore wrote:
> During the "make" of GCC-4.7.1 I receive the following output:
>
> **
> make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc'
> gcc -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall
> -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prot
On 1/4/2013 11:04 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>
> If you are interested I have this: https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
> May hold some good info for you.
> The BLFS is not complete but I am working on it.
>
Thanks. I will check it out. But later. I want to get through at least
one build completely
I'm sure that this has been addressed in prior topics; however I'm unable to
find it in any archive.
During the "make" of GCC-4.7.1 I receive the following output:
**
make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc'
gcc -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS
JIA Pei wrote:
>
> My configuration of booting LFS is also pasted:
> *menuentry "MyLinux distribution (on /dev/sdd1)" --class gnu-linux --class
> gnu --class os {*
> * insmod gzio*
> * insmod part_msdos*
> * insmod ext2*
> * set root='(hd3,msdos1)'*
> * search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
> a2
Chris J. Breisch wrote:
> On 1/3/2013 10:13 AM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
>> On 1/3/2013 9:50 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>>> I got that package wrong before also, before I scripted my builds.
>>> In my experience this is generally related to the bash environment or
>>> the host system requirements.
>>> Tr
On 1/3/2013 10:13 AM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
> On 1/3/2013 9:50 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>>
>> I got that package wrong before also, before I scripted my builds.
>> In my experience this is generally related to the bash environment or
>> the host system requirements.
>> Try running the version-check.
Hi, all:
Unfortunately, after rebuilding LFS on a USB flash, I still kept obtaining
the following errors as shown in picture
http://visionopen.com/questions/lfs_svn_20130102_usbflash_boot.jpg:
Are those question marks problematic?
My configuration of booting LFS is also pasted:
*menuentry "MyLi
14 matches
Mail list logo
