Re: [lfs-support] (no subject)

2012-12-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:53:53PM -0800, JIA Pei wrote: > > So, which *pwd* should I run make *mrproper* ? > The directory created when you untarred the package. Not sure of the package version you are using, but linux-3.* should match. Same as in chapter 5 : untar the package, cd into the d

Re: [lfs-support] How to proceed to Install Basic System Software ?

2012-12-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
JIA Pei wrote: > Hi, Bruce: > > It's me, Pei, who dropped a lot of questions at linuxfromscratch > mailinglist. Sorry that I'm writing to you and bug you directly. > > I strictly follow > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/index.html and now > proceeding to *6. Installing Basic Sy

[lfs-support] (no subject)

2012-12-19 Thread JIA Pei
Hi, lfs support: Sorry I'm writing to you and bug you again I strictly follow http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/index.html and now proceeding to *6. Installing Basic System Software * I can successfully proceed until http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/cha

Re: [lfs-support] error while makeing gcc

2012-12-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 02:36:46AM +0530, Prabhu wrote: > Hi I'm getting this error while *make* gcc in target machine (LFS7.2 > chapter 6.17) > > ** > *-e > 's,@toolexeclibdir@,/usr/--libexecdir=/usr/lib--enable-shared--enable-threads=posix--enable-__cxa_atexit--enable-clocale=gnu--enable-la

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

2012-12-19 Thread JIA Pei
Thanks Bruce... Thank you so much... I still met some testing errors, but this doesn't prevent me from installing make-3.82 ... Anyway, I'm proceeding... *1 Test in 1 Category Failed (See .diff files in work dir for details) :-(* * * *make[2]: *** [check-regression] Error 1* *make[2]: Leaving

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

2012-12-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
JIA Pei wrote: > Problem solved. > It seems I need to do > *reconfigration *after setting CFLAGS="-L/tools/lib -lpthread", and then > proceed to *make* . > > It's all about the ./configure. > Better add one command *$ CFLAGS="-L/tools/lib -lpthread"* before > *./configure > --prefix=/tools* > in

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

2012-12-19 Thread JIA Pei
Problem solved. It seems I need to do *reconfigration *after setting CFLAGS="-L/tools/lib -lpthread", and then proceed to *make* . It's all about the ./configure. Better add one command *$ CFLAGS="-L/tools/lib -lpthread"* before *./configure --prefix=/tools* in the user manual. cheers Pei On W

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

2012-12-19 Thread JIA Pei
Hi, Chris: Unfortunately, I spent another 4 hours to rebuild everything from scratch, with glibc patched this time. Still, the same. I still obtained the following error message: */mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: check_thread_stress-chec

Re: [lfs-support] Booting LFS Error Kernel Panic

2012-12-19 Thread Simon Geard
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 11:19 +, Richard Melville wrote > > Would't using GPT instead of MBR be a viable alternative? Nope. GPT assigns UUIDs to the partitions, but that's all - the kernel still deals only with traditional device names (sda1, sda2, etc). The initramfs is still needed t