On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 13:19 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
>
> Hi, Michael:
>
>
> Thank you very much for your detailed reply, so clear !!
> My Host System Requirements gives me the following result:
Note - that script isn't something you just run. It's something you have
to actually read the output of,
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 14:46 +, Michael E. Maher wrote:
> Hi Pei,
>
> The '--enable-kernel' parameter specifies the minimum version of the
> Linux kernel required to run the resulting glibc.
And to elaborate - the minimum kernel version you need to support isn't
the one you're installing, it's
JIA Pei wrote:
> */bin/sh -> /bin/dash*
This *will* create problems when building glibc. It needs to be bash.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 13:19 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
>
> Hi, Michael:
>
>
> Thank you very much for your detailed reply, so clear !!
> My Host System Requirements gives me the following result:
>
...
>
> root@peijia-GA-870A-UD3:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build# bash
> version-check.sh
> bash, versio
Hi, Michael:
Thank you very much for your detailed reply, so clear !!
My* **Host System Requirements* gives me the following result:
*root@peijia-GA-870A-UD3:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build# cat >
version-check.sh << "EOF"*
*> #!/bin/bash*
*> # Simple script to list version numbers of critical deve
On 12/16/2012 06:55 AM, JIA Pei wrote:
>
> Hi, all:
>
> 1) From
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html
> , binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why?
> What is this patch for?
>
> *patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch*
>
It tells you in the book. Try
JIA Pei wrote these words on 12/16/12 05:55 CST:
> Hi, all:
>
> 1) From
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html,
> binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why?
>
> 2) Since I'm trying to use the most recent package, say binutils-2.23.1,
> instead of binutils-2.22
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 04:47 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
>
> Hi, all:
>
>
> After successfully built
> binutils
> gcc
> linux-kernel
>
>
> now, I'm
> following http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html
> to build glibc. make brings me the following errors:
>
>
> make[2]:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 04:30 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
>
>
> Hi, all:
>
>
>
>
> Refer
> to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html
>
>
> glibc-2.16.0 configuration, the version of enabled kernel
>
>
> --enable-kernel=2.6.25 \
>
>
>
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 03:55 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
>
>
> Hi, all:
>
>
> 1) From
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html
> , binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why?
>
> What is this patch for?
>
>
> patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch
>
>
Hi, all:
After successfully built
binutils
gcc
linux-kernel
now, I'm following
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html
to build glibc. *make *brings me the following errors:
*make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.16.0/csu'*
*make[1]: *** [csu/subdir_li
Hi, all:
Refer to
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html
glibc-2.16.0 configuration, the version of enabled kernel
*--enable-kernel=2.6.25 \*
Does this refer to the installed kernel? Should 2.6.25 be the same as the
Linux kernel vers
Hi, all:
1) From
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html,
binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why?
What is this patch for?
*patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch*
2) Since I'm trying to use the most recent package, say binutils-2.23.1,
instead of b
13 matches
Mail list logo
