On 11/24/12, nettxzl wrote:
> On 11/24/12, William Harrington wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 23, 2012, at 8:46 PM, nettxzl wrote:
>>
My present LFS/BLFS is based on a hybrid LFS-6.3/SVN version
(SVN-20080412, SVN-20080423)
>>>
>>> I forgot to mention, I installed xz separately because it was
On 11/24/12, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2012, at 8:46 PM, nettxzl wrote:
>
>>>
>>> My present LFS/BLFS is based on a hybrid LFS-6.3/SVN version
>>> (SVN-20080412, SVN-20080423)
>>
>> I forgot to mention, I installed xz separately because it was not part
>> of LFS-6.3.
>> --
>> http:/
Ken Moffat wrote:
>> 2009-03-05 1.22
>> # Support for xz compression (--xz option)
>> # Short option -J is reassigned as a shortcut for --xz
>>
>> (And support for xz compression, and the short option -J in place of
>> --xz was only introduced in 1.22)
>>
> That matches my experience - back in
On Nov 23, 2012, at 8:46 PM, nettxzl wrote:
>>
>> My present LFS/BLFS is based on a hybrid LFS-6.3/SVN version
>> (SVN-20080412, SVN-20080423)
>
> I forgot to mention, I installed xz separately because it was not part
> of LFS-6.3.
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
>
> My present LFS/BLFS is based on a hybrid LFS-6.3/SVN version
> (SVN-20080412, SVN-20080423)
I forgot to mention, I installed xz separately because it was not part
of LFS-6.3.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscr
On Nov 23, 2012, at 8:22 PM, nettxzl wrote:
Ok, I updated the tar version on my host system to tar-1.22 (from
1.19) and now it works fine.
-Jxf works, -xf works
From
:LFS 7.0 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.1/chapter05/gcc-pass1.html
to LFS 7.1 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lf
On 11/24/12, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2012, at 8:11 PM, nettxzl wrote:
>
>> As I said in my first post, my version of tar is 1.19
>
> What is your HOST OS and output of tar --help ?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> William Harrington.
Ok, I was getting to it. I was in the middle of updating to
On 11/24/12, nettxzl wrote:
> (Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have
> vanished.)
>
> Hi,
>
> I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was
> trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following the command
> given there:
>
> tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1
On Nov 23, 2012, at 8:11 PM, nettxzl wrote:
As I said in my first post, my version of tar is 1.19
What is your HOST OS and output of tar --help ?
Sincerely,
William Harrington.--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsu
On 11/24/12, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2012, at 7:22 PM, nettxzl wrote:
>
>> But not -xz. If you look at the changelogs you pasted there is no
>> mention of -xz. At most they only mention -lzma which is the
>> predecessor to -xz.
>
> xz installs the link for lzma.
>
> -xz isn't a va
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 09:22:50AM +0800, nettxzl wrote:
> On 11/24/12, William Harrington wrote:
> >
> >
> > Tar has been able to auto-detect the compression method based on the
> > extension since
> >
> > as per changelog
> >
> > 2009-09-08 Sergey Poznyakoff
> >
[...]
>
> But not -xz. If you
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:26:31AM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> --- Em qua, 21/11/12, Tobias Gasser escreveu:
>
> > it's a pitty lo is not able to check the installed
> > libraries. either you
> > use --with-system-xx (or as for librsvg --enable-xx=system)
> > or lo will
> > build it's o
On Nov 23, 2012, at 7:22 PM, nettxzl wrote:
But not -xz. If you look at the changelogs you pasted there is no
mention of -xz. At most they only mention -lzma which is the
predecessor to -xz.
xz installs the link for lzma.
-xz isn't a valid option for tar. I don't know what you are getting at
On 11/24/12, Firerat wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2012 00:33, "nettxzl" wrote:
>>
>> (Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have
> vanished.)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was
>> trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following th
On 11/24/12, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2012, at 6:33 PM, nettxzl wrote:
>
>> (Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have
>> vanished.)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was
>> trying to unpack the files compressed wit
On Nov 23, 2012, at 7:07 PM, nettxzl wrote:
Hi, good to know. I tried it out
tar -xf filename.xz
but it does not unpack and I get the error messages
what's your host OS and the md5sum of the archive and does it match
the book's md5sum, and where did you download it from?
Sincerely,
Wi
On 11/24/12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> nettxzl wrote:
>> (Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have
>> vanished.)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was
>> trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following the command
>> given ther
On 24 Nov 2012 00:33, "nettxzl" wrote:
>
> (Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have
vanished.)
>
> Hi,
>
> I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was
> trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following the command
> given there:
>
> tar -Jxf ..
On Nov 23, 2012, at 6:33 PM, nettxzl wrote:
> (Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have
> vanished.)
>
> Hi,
>
> I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was
> trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following the command
> given there:
>
> tar
nettxzl wrote:
> (Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have vanished.)
>
> Hi,
>
> I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was
> trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following the command
> given there:
>
> tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1.tar.xz
>
> but
(Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have vanished.)
Hi,
I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was
trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following the command
given there:
tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1.tar.xz
but I got this error message:
tar: i
On Nov 23, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Thomas de Roo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody know of an alternative source for xz?
> http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4.tar.xz seems to be down.
>
> Groet,
> Thomas
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
On 23/11/12 22:34, spiky wrote:
> On 23/11/12 22:23, Thomas de Roo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Does anybody know of an alternative source for xz?
>> http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4.tar.xz seems to be down.
>>
>> Groet,
>> Thomas
> Whats the problem with that ?
ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/../pub/lfs/lfs-pac
On 23/11/12 22:23, Thomas de Roo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody know of an alternative source for xz?
> http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4.tar.xz seems to be down.
>
> Groet,
> Thomas
Whats the problem with that ?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfrom
Hi all,
Does anybody know of an alternative source for xz?
http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4.tar.xz seems to be down.
Groet,
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 11/23/2012 12:47 PM, Olivier Desbiens wrote:
> Ken Moffat ntlworld.com> writes:
>
>> No, not at all normal - in 7.2 we don't patch gcc.
>>
>> /tools/lib/crti.o comes from glibc. Did you run the sanity check
>> after installing glibc ?
>>
>> You are also using /tools-7.2 - perhaps something
Ken Moffat ntlworld.com> writes:
>
> No, not at all normal - in 7.2 we don't patch gcc.
>
> /tools/lib/crti.o comes from glibc. Did you run the sanity check
> after installing glibc ?
>
> You are also using /tools-7.2 - perhaps something broke when you
> decided not to use /tools.
>
> ĸen
27 matches
Mail list logo
