On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Whitequill Riclo wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs
> wrote:
> >
> >> Whitequill Riclo wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've been looking for this for a very long time, I have this problem
> too!
> >>> and I've had it for months, and mo
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
> I have put lfs in fstab
> Israel
> On Sep 10, 2012 9:30 PM, "Bruce Dubbs" wrote:
>
>> Israel Silberg wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > During the compilation of coreutils I encountered a problem that
>> required a
>> > reboot.
>> > After the reboot
Hi Bruce,
Thank you very much for your suggestion and quick response. I'll try 7.2
from scratch and I'll post another thread to get back with my result.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Yida Zhang
2012/9/11 Bruce Dubbs
> Yida Zhang wrote:
> > Hi, Guys
> >
> > I have encountered the same problem. But it
Yida Zhang wrote:
> Hi, Guys
>
> I have encountered the same problem. But it seems that mine is more
> serious. Please see the output of the make -k check as follows:
> === ld Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 560
> # of unexpected failures 143
> # of expected failures 61
> # of untested testc
Hi, Guys
I have encountered the same problem. But it seems that mine is more
serious. Please see the output of the make -k check as follows:
=== ld tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /tools/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file
for target.
Usi
Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> I think there was any problem when i built the kernel for LFS.
> You can send me .config file of LFS ?
It depends on your hardware.
> When I type "make modules_install", It displays :
>
> root:/sources/linux-3.2.6# make modules_install
>INSTALL arch/x86/kernel/test_nx.
Hi Henrik,
Thank you for your reply.
I've already tried to boot by UUID but the problem was same.
I think there was any problem when i built the kernel for LFS.
You can send me .config file of LFS ?
When I type "make modules_install", It displays :
root:/sources/linux-3.2.6# make modules_insta
Lewis Pike wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:36:50PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> You are right. That section needs to be updated.
>>
>> Look in /dev/disk/by-id/. You should see a cd or dvd device. In my
>> case, I have:
>>
>> disk/by-id/ata-PLDS_DVD+_-RW_DH-16A6S -> ../../sr0
>>
>> If I do ud
On 09/10/2012 06:53 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 06:51 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> On 09/05/2012 11:26 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2012 10:35 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
Here is the link if anyone is interested and w
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:36:50PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> You are right. That section needs to be updated.
>
> Look in /dev/disk/by-id/. You should see a cd or dvd device. In my
> case, I have:
>
> disk/by-id/ata-PLDS_DVD+_-RW_DH-16A6S -> ../../sr0
>
> If I do udevadm test /sys/block/sr0
On 09/06/2012 06:51 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 11:26 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> On 08/24/2012 10:35 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>>> I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
>>>
>>> Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have a look.
>>>
>>> https://github.com
Lewis Pike wrote:
> LFS 7.2 section 7.5 "Creating Custom Symlinks to Devices" advises the
> reader to edit /lib/udev/rules.d/75-cd-aliases-generator.rules as
> needed. Unfortuantely, I can't find this file on my LFS system.
>
> It looks like the udev package underwent some signifcant changes
> bet
Mikie wrote:
> also with BLFS dates Aug 2012 I got this error:
>
> ldconfig: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.16-gdb.py is not an ELF file - it has the
> wrong magic bytes at the start.
Yes, that file is in the wrong directory. It's a python file not a
library. It was fixed in svn several months ago
LFS 7.2 section 7.5 "Creating Custom Symlinks to Devices" advises the
reader to edit /lib/udev/rules.d/75-cd-aliases-generator.rules as
needed. Unfortuantely, I can't find this file on my LFS system.
It looks like the udev package underwent some signifcant changes
between LFS-7.1 & LFS-7.2 so per
I have put lfs in fstab
Israel
On Sep 10, 2012 9:30 PM, "Bruce Dubbs" wrote:
> Israel Silberg wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > During the compilation of coreutils I encountered a problem that
> required a
> > reboot.
> > After the reboot i chrooted like it says in the beggining of chapter 6
> and
> > after
Israel Silberg wrote:
> Hi all,
> During the compilation of coreutils I encountered a problem that required a
> reboot.
> After the reboot i chrooted like it says in the beggining of chapter 6 and
> after it the coreutils check with the NON_ROOT... Writes me that it can't
> open a sub shell. Whst c
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:58:08PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> If the root device doesn't exist : occasionally, the order of
> disks/controllers can change, but um;ess your host system was
> running a very old kernel, I don't think that is likely.
That should read: but unless your host system w
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:49:35PM +0200, Armin K. wrote:
> Dana 10.9.2012 8:06, Ken Moffat je napisao:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:38:45AM +, Kenno Han wrote:
> >>> Sounds like you need UPower
> >> It doesn't say anything about UPower...
> >>
>
> Xfce chapter seems to be missing lot of dep
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:01:21PM +0700, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just finished LFS. However, I'm facing with the problem that I can't
> boot into the LFS kernel.
>
> It displays :
>
> VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb1" or unkonwn-block(2,0)
> Please append a correct "root=" boot
On 09/10/12 14:01, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just finished LFS. However, I'm facing with the problem that I
> can't boot into the LFS kernel.
>
> It displays :
>
> VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb1" or unkonwn-block(2,0)
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option;
>
>
>
> Kern
Hi all,
During the compilation of coreutils I encountered a problem that required a
reboot.
After the reboot i chrooted like it says in the beggining of chapter 6 and
after it the coreutils check with the NON_ROOT... Writes me that it can't
open a sub shell. Whst can be the reason? Should I start f
Sorry ... I sent to lfs not blfs ... so now I will make this question b-gone
from lfs
Thanks.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Dana 10.9.2012 8:06, Ken Moffat je napisao:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:38:45AM +, Kenno Han wrote:
>>> Sounds like you need UPower
>> It doesn't say anything about UPower...
>>
>
> And, because the book is perfect you will ignore my suggestion.
> OK, it's not my problem.
>
>>> it's probably
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just finished LFS. However, I'm facing with the problem that I
>> can't boot into the LFS kernel.
>>
>> It displays :
>>
>> VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb1" or unkonwn-block(2,0)
>> Please append a correct "root=" boot option;
>>
>>
>>
>> Kernel panic - not syncing :
Em 10-09-2012 10:26, Henrik /KaarPoSoft escreveu:> You may try root=/dev/sda1
> Sometimes device naming is not consistent between distros.
>
> On 09/10/12 14:01, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just finished LFS. However, I'm facing with the problem that I
>> can't boot into the LFS kern
You may try root=/dev/sda1
Sometimes device naming is not consistent between distros.
On 09/10/12 14:01, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just finished LFS. However, I'm facing with the problem that I
> can't boot into the LFS kernel.
>
> It displays :
>
> VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb1"
Hi all,
I've just finished LFS. However, I'm facing with the problem that I can't
boot into the LFS kernel.
It displays :
VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb1" or unkonwn-block(2,0)
Please append a correct "root=" boot option;
Kernel panic - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root fs on un
27 matches
Mail list logo
