Hi again;
This is my mistake. I solved it re-compiling* gcc.
*
Regards
2012/9/7 Aydın Demirel
> Hi William;
>
>
> 2012/9/7 William Harrington
>
>>
>> On Sep 6, 2012, at 08:03 AM, Aydın Demirel wrote:
>>
>> /opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-**build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(**
>>> gethnamaddr.os):/opt
Hi William;
2012/9/7 William Harrington
>
> On Sep 6, 2012, at 08:03 AM, Aydın Demirel wrote:
>
> /opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-**build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(**
>> gethnamaddr.os):/opt/newroot/**src/glibc-2.16.0/resolv/**gethnamaddr.c:636:
>> more undefined references to `__stack_chk_guard' fo
On 09/07/2012 01:12 AM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
> Baho Utot schrieb:
>> I always build all of LFS with -j4 or -j8 and it has not failed me.
>>
> so you just had very very much luck on your way...
>
> there are packages which CAN fail with parallel builds.
yes i know that, but I do not attribute my su
On Sep 6, 2012, at 08:03 AM, Aydın Demirel wrote:
/opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a
(gethnamaddr.os):/opt/newroot/src/glibc-2.16.0/resolv/gethnamaddr.c:
636: more undefined references to `__stack_chk_guard' follow
Maybe you are missing some sed commands:
http://www.l
Hi;
Do you have any ideas on this?
Regards
*Aydın Demirel
--
Linux System Administrator*
*Endersys Consultancy and Software Ltd.*
*
*
2012/9/6 Aydın Demirel
> Hi;
>
> I try to compile glibc-2.16 version. But I'm getting following error when
> I execute make command:
Richard Melville wrote:
> > I've noticed that this was recommended way back on LFS 3.3 but now seems
> to
> > have been dropped. As all the distros appear to have caught up with LFS
> by
> > having this symlink what are the current views here on creating it? I've
> > noticed some discussion on th
On 09/03/2012 03:53 PM, Israel Silberg wrote:
> > checking for MPFR... no
> > configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including
> > static vs shared).
> > make[2]: *** [configure-stage1-mpc] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
> > make[1]: *** [s
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:12:42AM +0200, Tobias Gasser wrote:
>
> recently i had intermittent failures on both xulrunner and firefox where
> i build with -jX since a very long time. with version 15.0 the build
> fails at about half of the builds on my system. giving -j1 runs fine. i
> can use 8 c
