Re: [lfs-support] Any female LFS hackers?

2012-09-04 Thread Jasmine Iwanek
On 2012-09-05 07:13, Oshadha Gunawardena wrote: > Hi all, > > I am wondering if there are any female LFS hackers out there :P. This > is just to get an idea about the community, please ignore if this > message is irrelevant > > Thanks, > Oshadha.  Nope, I'm a carrot, same for elly and anyone else

[lfs-support] Any female LFS hackers?

2012-09-04 Thread Oshadha Gunawardena
Hi all, I am wondering if there are any female LFS hackers out there :P. This is just to get an idea about the community, please ignore if this message is irrelevant Thanks, Oshadha. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Uns

Re: [lfs-support] The learning process

2012-09-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Sorry, resending with correct line width. Em 02-09-2012 15:18, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Mikie wrote: [...] >> This is exactly like LFS and every Linux article I find for the most >> part. ... and there is nothing wrong with LFS it's a great thing for >> advanced people and there are lots of grea

Re: [lfs-support] The learning process

2012-09-04 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 02-09-2012 15:18, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Mikie wrote: [...] >> This is exactly like LFS and every Linux article I find for the most >> part. ... and there is nothing wrong with LFS it's a great thing for >> advanced people and there are lots of great things out there for >> advanced Linux pe

Re: [lfs-support] Grub 2.00 and LFS errata

2012-09-04 Thread Mikie
Well for missing one thing in a million you still get an A++ 1/1,000,000 = 99.99 = A++ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-support] Grub 2.00 and LFS errata

2012-09-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Mikie wrote: > Hello all, > > In my perusings (is that a real word?) of the grub release notes at: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2012-06/msg00093.html > > I read this ... just pass the middle: > > * grub-mkdevicemap removed. Now all devices are detected on invocation of >any

[lfs-support] Grub 2.00 and LFS errata

2012-09-04 Thread Mikie
Hello all, In my perusings (is that a real word?) of the grub release notes at: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2012-06/msg00093.html I read this ... just pass the middle: * grub-mkdevicemap removed. Now all devices are detected on invocation of any grub utility. Does this mean

[lfs-support] LFS V7.2 gcc compile error

2012-09-04 Thread Michael Niehren
Hi together, i try to compile LFS V7.2 on an actual Centos V6.3 (i686) System. If i try to compile gcc V4.7.1 for the temporary system, everythin set as described in the Book, i get the following error: Checking multilib configuration for libstdc++-v3...

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1

2012-09-04 Thread Baho Utot
On 09/03/2012 11:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Walter Webb wrote: >> I just joined this list and can't respond properly. >> I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg. >> I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked. > Good point. Using -j > 1 can cause problems in some packages. It can >

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1

2012-09-04 Thread Israel Silberg
Another day, another try. I extracted the gcc again and did it again, and this time it worked. Thanks all for your support. On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Richard Melville < richard.melvill...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Walter Webb wrote: >> > I just joined this list and can't respond properly. >

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1

2012-09-04 Thread Richard Melville
> > Walter Webb wrote: > > I just joined this list and can't respond properly. > > I had a different file not found than Israel Silberg. > > I unset MAKEFLAGS and retried, and it worked. > I'm glad you got it to build, but that's the conclusion of a simple empiricist. It's like me saying that bec

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 GCC pass 1

2012-09-04 Thread Steve Crosby
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Melville wrote: >> I extracted all of these packages from within the GCC-4.7.1 folder > > I'd still be interested to know why we build GMP, MPC, and MPFR inside GCC > except on the final build where they are built separately. > > Richard > During pass 1,