On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:33:19PM -0500, Garrett Gaston wrote:
>
> Below is what I'M getting:
> if test "bash" = "gettext-tools"; then \ /bin/sh
> /sources/Chapter-6/6.31._Bash-4.2/bash-4.2/./support/mkinstalldirs
> /usr/share/gettext/po; \ for file in Makefile.in.in remove-potcdate.sin
> qu
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:38:26PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> What was wrong with ken.moffat? Taken?
>
I've still just about got an account in my name at a previous isp -
it gives out too much information to automated harvesting of
addresses. So far, I haven't been invited to purchase a boo
On 8/28/2012 5:11 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:12:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat írta:
zarniwhoop? :) LOL.
Yes ? What's so funny ?
Seriously - you only just noticed ? When I got broadband, all the
good names were already taken. Apart from a long perio
Garrett Gaston wrote:
>
> Below is what I'M getting:
> if test "bash" = "gettext-tools"; then \ /bin/sh
> /sources/Chapter-6/6.31._Bash-4.2/bash-4.2/./support/mkinstalldirs
> /usr/share/gettext/po; \ for file in Makefile.in.in remove-potcdate.sin
> quot.sed boldquot.sed en@quot.header en@boldq
On 08/28/2012 06:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
[putolin]
> What was wrong with ken.moffat?
LOL.I don't think anyone shoukd answer that.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:12:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Ken Moffat írta:
>>
>> zarniwhoop? :) LOL.
>>
> Yes ? What's so funny ?
It just struck me that way.
> Seriously - you only just noticed ?
Yes. The address between the <> doesn't normally show on my emai
Below is what I'M getting:
if test "bash" = "gettext-tools"; then \ /bin/sh
/sources/Chapter-6/6.31._Bash-4.2/bash-4.2/./support/mkinstalldirs
/usr/share/gettext/po; \ for file in Makefile.in.in remove-potcdate.sin
quot.sed boldquot.sed en@quot.header en@boldquot.header insert-header.sin
Rul
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:12:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Ken Moffat írta:
>
> zarniwhoop? :) LOL.
>
Yes ? What's so funny ?
Seriously - you only just noticed ? When I got broadband, all the
good names were already taken. Apart from a long period when I
couldn't access the account
Mike Johnston wrote:
> Maybe I'm dense here, but the Util-Linux doesn't have a fsck.ext2 or
> fsck.ext3 in it's list of programs installed. Which module installs
> an fsck capable of ext2/3 filesystems?
>
> When I built Util-linux I didn't get a fsck.ext2 or ext3. I only saw
> those if I left the
On 08/28/2012 05:05 PM, Mike Johnston wrote:
Maybe I'm dense here, but the Util-Linux doesn't have a fsck.ext2 or
fsck.ext3 in it's list of programs installed. Which module installs
an fsck capable of ext2/3 filesystems?
When I built Util-linux I didn't get a fsck.ext2 or ext3. I only saw
t
Maybe I'm dense here, but the Util-Linux doesn't have a fsck.ext2 or fsck.ext3
in it's list of programs installed. Which module installs an fsck capable of
ext2/3 filesystems?
When I built Util-linux I didn't get a fsck.ext2 or ext3. I only saw those if
I left the --disable-fsck off the e2fsp
Mike Johnston wrote:
> So I built util-linux-2.20.1 and it has fsck, fsck.minix.
>
> Building e2fs the command line in the 7.1 book has the
> "--disable-fsck" flag in the configure. This prevents the ext2/3/4
> from being built.
>
> The list of installed programs lower in the book shows them being
So I built util-linux-2.20.1 and it has fsck, fsck.minix.
Building e2fs the command line in the 7.1 book has the "--disable-fsck" flag in
the configure. This prevents the ext2/3/4 from being built.
The list of installed programs lower in the book shows them being installed.
I'm just not sure h
Mike Johnston wrote:
> Hello, It seems the fsck programs for ext2 and ext3 don't get built
> in LFS 7.1. They are explicitly not built by config for the
> e2fsprogs.
I have:
$ ls -1 /sbin/fsc*
/sbin/fsck
/sbin/fsck.cramfs
/sbin/fsck.ext2
/sbin/fsck.ext3
/sbin/fsck.ext4
/sbin/fsck.ext4dev
/sbin/f
Hello,
It seems the fsck programs for ext2 and ext3 don't get built in LFS 7.1. They
are explicitly not built by config for the e2fsprogs. Are they built/installed
someplace else?
Thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.h
On Aug 28, 2012, at 14:44 PM, Eleanore Boyd wrote:
> On 8/28/2012 2:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Ken Moffat írta:
>> zarniwhoop? :) LOL.
>>
>> -- Bruce
> Indeed. Though my favorite line comes from a video game: "No one
> likes a
> smart ass."
> :)
>
> Elly
>
I wouldn't expect Bruce to
On 8/28/2012 2:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat írta:
> zarniwhoop? :) LOL.
>
> -- Bruce
Indeed. Though my favorite line comes from a video game: "No one likes a
smart ass."
:)
Elly
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs
> Ken Moffat írta:
zarniwhoop? :) LOL.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Ken Moffat írta:
>On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:28:13PM +0200, x yy wrote:>
> Hi! >
> >
> I had been using LFS for half a year until I realized that keeping it
> up-to-date is a pain. I feel I'd like to have some hard work again:), so now
> I'm trying to upgrade that system.>
> As far as I kn
On Tuesday 28 August 2012 13:05:46 Nate Muench wrote:
> But wouldn't removing kdenetwork break networking in a BLFS system?
The kdenetwork package contains these programs:
kget: Download manager (mostly useful if you're using konqueror as your
browser, but i guess most people use firefox)
kppp: p
Garrett Gaston wrote:
>
> I placed all the commands for chapter-6, bash into a script and then
> executed it. A the bottom of the page all I see is make[1]: Leaving
> directory `/sources/Chapter-6/6.31._bash-4.2/po' at the bottom of the
> page with no prompt in sight. Does this look and sound right
On Aug 28, 2012, at 13:32 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote:
> I placed all the commands for chapter-6, bash into a script and
> then executed it. A the bottom of the page all I see is make[1]:
> Leaving directory `/sources/Chapter-6/6.31._bash-4.2/po' at the
> bottom of the page with no prompt in s
I placed all the commands for chapter-6, bash into a script and then executed
it. A the bottom of the page all I see is make[1]: Leaving directory
`/sources/Chapter-6/6.31._bash-4.2/po' at the bottom of the page with no prompt
in sight. Does this look and sound right? Is it likely still running
23 matches
Mail list logo
