On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 07:13 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:45:48PM -0700, Michael Robinson wrote:
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/basicnet/libtirpc.html
> >
> > bash-4.2# autoreconf
> > bash: /usr/bin/autoreconf: /tools/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such fi
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:45:48PM -0700, Michael Robinson wrote:
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/basicnet/libtirpc.html
>
> bash-4.2# autoreconf
> bash: /usr/bin/autoreconf: /tools/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or
> directory
> bash-4.2#
>
/usr/bin/autoreconf is a pe
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:25:40PM -0700, Michael Robinson wrote:
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/basicnet/rpcbind.html
>
> /usr/lib/libtirpc.so: undefined reference to `key_encryptsession_pk'
> /usr/lib/libtirpc.so: undefined reference to `key_gendes'
> /usr/lib/libtirpc.so: undef
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/basicnet/libtirpc.html
bash-4.2# autoreconf
bash: /usr/bin/autoreconf: /tools/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or
directory
bash-4.2#
I am chrooted from an NFS client. I need to get libtirpc installed to
get NFS root working so I can boot th
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/basicnet/rpcbind.html
bash-4.2# make
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/rpcbind-0.2.0'
Making all in src
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/rpcbind-0.2.0/src'
make all-am
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/rpcbind-0.2.0/src'
/bin/sh .
On 08/24/2012 06:46 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Feuerbacher, Alan wrote these words on 08/24/12 17:23 CST:
>> Bruce wrote:
>>
>>> Linux looks in /lib and /usr/lib by default. LD_LIBRARY_PATH just says
>>> to add that to the search path. /etc/ld.so.conf can also add
>>> directories to be searched.
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote these words on 08/24/12 17:23 CST:
> Bruce wrote:
>
>> Linux looks in /lib and /usr/lib by default. LD_LIBRARY_PATH just says
>> to add that to the search path. /etc/ld.so.conf can also add
>> directories to be searched.
>
> So looking in /lib and /usr/lib is hardwired?
Bruce wrote:
> Linux looks in /lib and /usr/lib by default. LD_LIBRARY_PATH just says
> to add that to the search path. /etc/ld.so.conf can also add
> directories to be searched.
So looking in /lib and /usr/lib is hardwired?
I take it that in normal circumstances, /etc/ld.so.conf is sort of a
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>
>>> ... So I have to install everything in my own directories. I've
>>> succeeded in doing this, and am now tying up a lot of loose
>>> ends.
>>
>> You could have told us that at the beginning!
>
> Sorry, I didn't think it was relevant.
>
>> Use:
>>
>> expo
Elly wrote:
> Then my first suggestion would be to ask the sysadmin about testing the
> latest version of the software you're using,
> or test it yourself. If it works as good or better, then see about convincing
> them to upgrade everything to its latest
> version. You could also make the case
Bruce wrote:
> > ... So I have to install everything in my own directories. I've
> > succeeded in doing this, and am now tying up a lot of loose ends.
>
> You could have told us that at the beginning!
Sorry, I didn't think it was relevant.
> Use:
>
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/ho
On 8/24/2012 4:07 PM, Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
Elly wrote:
I suspect that something to do with ldconfig is my problem, but I
don't understand how that plays into the complete Linux system.
Alan
This might be completely off-topic, but have you tried using a VM to
build LFS? I have seen some
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>>> My ldconfig doesn't have a -a option.
>>
>> Sorry. Without the link and as root:
>>
>> # ldconfig -v | less
>
> What does running this as root get you as opposed to running it as a
> regular user? I don't have root access. So I ran this as a regul
Elly wrote:
> > I suspect that something to do with ldconfig is my problem, but I
> don't understand how that plays into the complete Linux system.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> This might be completely off-topic, but have you tried using a VM to
> build LFS? I have seen some portable versions of VirtualBox
On 8/24/2012 3:40 PM, Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>>> My ldconfig doesn't have a -a option.
>> Sorry. Without the link and as root:
>>
>> # ldconfig -v | less
> What does running this as root get you as opposed to running it as a regular
> user? I don't have root access. So I r
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > My ldconfig doesn't have a -a option.
>
> Sorry. Without the link and as root:
>
> # ldconfig -v | less
What does running this as root get you as opposed to running it as a regular
user? I don't have root access. So I ran this as a regular user.
I'm doing all this in un
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Try:
>> $ ldconfig -a
>
> My ldconfig doesn't have a -a option.
Sorry. Without the link and as root:
# ldconfig -v | less
The /lib section should have libbz2.so.1.0 -> libbz2.so.1.0.6
Then
$ ls -l /lib/libbz*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root15 Aug
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Try:
> $ ldconfig -a
My ldconfig doesn't have a -a option.
> $ ldd /bin/bzip2
Here you go. Remember that the link in question was removed.
$ ldd /bin/bzip2
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fffa6cb6000)
libbz2.so.1.0 => not found
libc.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc.so
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
>> /lib/libbz2.so.1.0 -> libbz2.so.1.0.6 /usr/lib/libbz2.so ->
>> ../../lib/libbz2.so.1.0
>
> Again, thanks for your comments. However, my system doesn't behave
> the way I would expect, in terms of what you've said. Here is what I
> have in /lib and /usr/lib :
>
> /lib/li
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
>
> >>> In the LFS book, version SVN-20120824, section 6.19.Bzip2-1.0.6,
> >> there
> >>> is a line near the end:
> >>>
> >>> ln -sv ../../lib/libbz2.so.1.0 /usr/lib/libbz2.so
> >>>
> >>> T
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
>>> In the LFS book, version SVN-20120824, section 6.19.Bzip2-1.0.6,
>> there
>>> is a line near the end:
>>>
>>> ln -sv ../../lib/libbz2.so.1.0 /usr/lib/libbz2.so
>>>
>>> The problem I've experienced is t
Baho Utot wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 11:50 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Baho Utot wrote:
>>> I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
>>>
>>> Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have a look.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
>>>
>>> I am going to u
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the LFS book, version SVN-20120824, section 6.19.Bzip2-1.0.6,
> there
> > is a line near the end:
> >
> > ln -sv ../../lib/libbz2.so.1.0 /usr/lib/libbz2.so
> >
> > The problem I've experienced is tha
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the LFS book, version SVN-20120824, section 6.19.Bzip2-1.0.6,
> there is a line near the end:
>
> ln -sv ../../lib/libbz2.so.1.0 /usr/lib/libbz2.so
>
> The problem I've experienced is that when bzip2 fires up after this
> com
On 08/24/2012 11:50 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>> I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
>>
>> Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have a look.
>>
>> https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
>>
>> I am going to update that repository to ve
Hi,
In the LFS book, version SVN-20120824, section 6.19.Bzip2-1.0.6, there is a
line near the end:
ln -sv ../../lib/libbz2.so.1.0 /usr/lib/libbz2.so
The problem I've experienced is that when bzip2 fires up after this compilation
step, it can't find the library libbz2.so.1.0 . W
Baho Utot wrote:
>
> I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
>
> Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have a look.
>
> https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
>
> I am going to update that repository to versions 7.0 7.1 and 7.2.
>
> The "build system" I u
I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have a look.
https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
I am going to update that repository to versions 7.0 7.1 and 7.2.
The "build system" I use for the tool chain chapter 5
Garrett Gaston wrote:
>
> Below is what I got for gcc on chapter 6. I placed all the commands from
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/gcc.html in a
> script using && at the end of each line. Does anyone have any idea which
> command from that page could have produced the
Below is what I got for gcc on chapter 6. I placed all the commands from
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/gcc.html in a script
using && at the end of each line. Does anyone have any idea which command from
that page could have produced the following error? Thanks.
Hi Elly,
Thanks for your feedback.
The building of tool chain between Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 are different. In
Chapter 6, the tools can be effective immediately once being installed. But
in Chapter 5, for example, the binutils-2.22 pass 1, the tools are with
prefix $LFS_TGT- (in my virtual bo
31 matches
Mail list logo
