Hi all,
For some unsolved reason I had to complete the chapter 6 without installing
an essential package, namely *udev*. Knowing that it will cause problems in
the future I would like to start again the chapter 6 from the beginning. So
my question is how do I manage my environment, I mean after st
On Aug 21, 2012, at 17:02 PM, Lewis Pike wrote:
> Can I safely leave the kernel headers from an earlier Linux version
> in place when rebuilding the kernel proper. Are the Linux headers
> guaranteed to be stable across security/bugfix versions? If Linux
> headers do need replacing when upgradin
Lewis Pike wrote these words on 08/21/12 17:02 CST:
> In section 6.7.1 of LFS 7.1 I installed the headers for linux-3.2.6.
> By the time I made to actually building the kernel proper I grabbed
> linux-3.2.27 from kernel.org.
This is perfectly fine. You can always upgrade the kernel proper. However
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 06:02:57PM -0400, Lewis Pike wrote:
> After a week and a half of wrestling with LFS, I have successfully
> built up what appears to be a working system. This was my third
> attempt and well, you know what they say. Thanks to all of the
> maintainers for this wonderful reso
After a week and a half of wrestling with LFS, I have successfully
built up what appears to be a working system. This was my third
attempt and well, you know what they say. Thanks to all of the
maintainers for this wonderful resource.
In section 6.7.1 of LFS 7.1 I installed the headers for linux
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:13:04AM +0100, Richard Melville wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, but perhaps not necessary - it seems to be a problem at my
> > end (see Bruce's response, and my reply to that). In particular,
> > the "run as a regular user" seems NOT to be the key.
> >
> > ?en
> > --
> > das ei
`/tools/bin/ld' -> `/tools/bin/ld-old'`/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld' ->
`/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld-old'mv: cannot stat `/tools/bin/ld-new': No
such file or directory
The placed all the commands for
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/readjusting.html in a
bash s
>
> Thanks, but perhaps not necessary - it seems to be a problem at my
> end (see Bruce's response, and my reply to that). In particular,
> the "run as a regular user" seems NOT to be the key.
>
> ?en
> --
> das eine Mal als Trag?die, das andere Mal als Farce
>
>
Probably not of much use to you