Re: [lfs-support] LFS-BOOK-7.0 Section 5.9 binutils pass2 doubt

2012-07-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Emerson Yesupatham wrote: > The higher the version number is, the less compatibility code is > added, and the faster the code gets. I'm not sure about that. It gets smaller, but I doubt it gets faster. At least not enough to be perceptible. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/l

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-BOOK-7.0 Section 5.9 binutils pass2 doubt

2012-07-03 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:02:43PM +0530, Emerson Yesupatham wrote: > > Emerson: Yes, this is my first build. I thought the value for > --enable-kernel must be the "same" as Host systems linux version (uname -r). > Now, I did little bit research on --enable-kernel option and found the > following

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-BOOK-7.0 Section 5.9 binutils pass2 doubt

2012-07-03 Thread Emerson Yesupatham
Hi Ken, Apologize for doing a top-post. I was not aware of it. Now I have provided my reply in interleaved post. > An now, to answer your question. If this is your first build of >LFS, I'm tempted to say FBBG (Follow Book, Book Good). So, that >would be --enable-kernel=2.6.25 (I'm looking at LFS