Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.15 make error undefined reference to `__rela_iplt_start' & undefined reference to `__rela_iplt_end'

2012-05-15 Thread lei huang
help help!!! On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:01 AM, lei huang wrote: > system: centos5.8 linux2.6.18 gcc44 > > lfs: binutils-2.22 gcc-4.7.0 glibc-2.15 > > lfs-man Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20120513 > > build glibc erro: > > gcc44 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o > /myos/user/tools_src/build-g

Re: [blfs-support] gedit-3.4.1 fails to compile

2012-05-15 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:26:34PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: > On 05/15/2012 05:38 PM, John Burrell wrote: > > > > gedit-3.4.0 installs okay but with 3.4.1 make I get: > > > > libxml2.parserError: Entity: line 1: parser error : Opening and ending > > tag > > mismatch: app line 1 and p > > нето

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.1: 6.37. Automake-1.11.3 (TEST FAILURE)!

2012-05-15 Thread Эмиль Кранц
By trial and error I have found that any action that takes more than one SBU in LFS is better off with -j1. BLFS packages are more agreeable with -j2 switch. On my dual core machine only kernel compiles flawlessly with -j2 switch. Binutils and compiled against them gcc and glibc were all faulty w

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.1: 6.37. Automake-1.11.3 (TEST FAILURE)!

2012-05-15 Thread Yasser Zamani
> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 23:05:28 +0100 > From: zarniwh...@ntlworld.com > To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.1: 6.37. Automake-1.11.3 (TEST FAILURE)! > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:56:10PM +0430, Yasser Zamani wrote: > > > > Is this failure expected or is a